Inquiry‐Based Science Instruction for Students With Disabilities: A Systematic and Meta‐Analytic Review

ABSTRACT Developing scientific literacy is necessary for students with disabilities (SWD) as it supports the ability to create solutions to real‐world problems and understand current events, and it strengthens critical thinking, problem‐solving, and complex communication skills. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate extant literature on inquiry‐based science interventions for SWD in service of developing scientific practices. We identified 26 studies in 22 articles and 3 dissertations for inclusion in this review. Effect size (ES) estimates demonstrate significant positive effects in both group (ES = 0.79; CI [0.41, 1.17]) and single case design studies (ES = 2.76; CI [1.93, 3.60]). Overall findings suggest that inquiry‐based science instruction is effective in teaching SWD science content as well as developing proficiency in scientific practices and inquiry skills.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70029
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inquiry‐Based Science Instruction for Students With Disabilities: A Systematic and Meta‐Analytic Review

Victoria J. VanUitert, Sarah Emily Wilson, Megan Rojo, Gail E. Lovette et al.
1 citations
Science Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
article

Inquiry‐Based Science Instruction for Students With Disabilities: A Systematic and Meta‐Analytic Review

Victoria J. VanUitert, Sarah Emily Wilson, Megan Rojo, Gail E. Lovette, Sarah K. Benson, William J. Therrien, Christian T. Doabler, Jenna Gersib, Sarah R. Powell, Maria A. Longhi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Developing scientific literacy is necessary for students with disabilities (SWD) as it supports the ability to create solutions to real‐world problems and understand current events, and it strengthens critical thinking, problem‐solving, and complex communication skills. The purpose of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to evaluate extant literature on inquiry‐based science interventions for SWD in service of developing scientific practices. We identified 26 studies in 22 articles and 3 dissertations for inclusion in this review. Effect size (ES) estimates demonstrate significant positive effects in both group (ES = 0.79; CI [0.41, 1.17]) and single case design studies (ES = 2.76; CI [1.93, 3.60]). Overall findings suggest that inquiry‐based science instruction is effective in teaching SWD science content as well as developing proficiency in scientific practices and inquiry skills.

Science EducationVol. 110(2)
University of North Texas (US), University of Dubai (AE), Bowling Green State University (US), University of Virginia (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Science Education and Pedagogy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inquiry‐Based Science Instruction for Students With Disabilities: A Systematic and Meta‐Analytic Review — Victoria J. VanUitert, Sarah Emily Wilson, et al. · Science Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS