Business sustainability measurement frameworks: a systematic literature review using a TCCM approach

Purpose This study systematically reviews sustainability measurement frameworks (SMFs) using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics and Methodology) approach to evaluate their theoretical foundations, contextual relevance, core constructs and methodological robustness across different types of enterprises, including commercial, non-profit and hybrid organisations. Design/methodology/approach A systematic quantitative literature review was conducted following the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. In total, 161 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1994 and 2024 were analysed. The TCCM framework structured the analysis to synthesise theoretical, contextual and methodological patterns in SMF research. Findings The review found that existing SMFs predominantly rely on traditional theories like Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory and are mainly designed for commercial enterprises. Most SMFs inadequately address the needs of non-profits and hybrid organisations. Research remains heavily concentrated in high-income regions, and there is limited multidimensionality and contextual adaptability in existing frameworks. Research limitations/implications This study uniquely applies the TCCM framework to the SMF literature, highlighting critical theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps. It calls for the development of inclusive, multidimensional and context-sensitive SMFs tailored to diverse enterprise types. Practical implications The findings suggest that policymakers, practitioners and enterprises must critically assess and adapt SMFs to better align with diverse organisational missions, particularly for social enterprises and non-profits, to enhance sustainability measurement effectiveness. Social implications Developing more inclusive and contextually sensitive SMFs can better capture and support the sustainability efforts of mission-driven organisations, promoting broader social equity, environmental stewardship and community well-being. Originality/value This study uniquely applies the TCCM framework to the SMF literature, highlighting critical theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps. It calls for the development of inclusive, multidimensional and context-sensitive SMFs tailored to diverse enterprise types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Trade Science
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jts-04-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Business sustainability measurement frameworks: a systematic literature review using a TCCM approach

Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, Aisha Khalid, Muhammad Abid Saleem, Farah Diba Yasmin et al.
Journal of Trade Science
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
article

Business sustainability measurement frameworks: a systematic literature review using a TCCM approach

Muhammad Haroon Hafeez, Aisha Khalid, Muhammad Abid Saleem, Farah Diba Yasmin, Hina Ismail
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study systematically reviews sustainability measurement frameworks (SMFs) using the TCCM (Theory, Context, Characteristics and Methodology) approach to evaluate their theoretical foundations, contextual relevance, core constructs and methodological robustness across different types of enterprises, including commercial, non-profit and hybrid organisations. Design/methodology/approach A systematic quantitative literature review was conducted following the SPAR-4-SLR protocol. In total, 161 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1994 and 2024 were analysed. The TCCM framework structured the analysis to synthesise theoretical, contextual and methodological patterns in SMF research. Findings The review found that existing SMFs predominantly rely on traditional theories like Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory and are mainly designed for commercial enterprises. Most SMFs inadequately address the needs of non-profits and hybrid organisations. Research remains heavily concentrated in high-income regions, and there is limited multidimensionality and contextual adaptability in existing frameworks. Research limitations/implications This study uniquely applies the TCCM framework to the SMF literature, highlighting critical theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps. It calls for the development of inclusive, multidimensional and context-sensitive SMFs tailored to diverse enterprise types. Practical implications The findings suggest that policymakers, practitioners and enterprises must critically assess and adapt SMFs to better align with diverse organisational missions, particularly for social enterprises and non-profits, to enhance sustainability measurement effectiveness. Social implications Developing more inclusive and contextually sensitive SMFs can better capture and support the sustainability efforts of mission-driven organisations, promoting broader social equity, environmental stewardship and community well-being. Originality/value This study uniquely applies the TCCM framework to the SMF literature, highlighting critical theoretical, contextual and methodological gaps. It calls for the development of inclusive, multidimensional and context-sensitive SMFs tailored to diverse enterprise types.

Journal of Trade ScienceVol. 13(4)
Bahauddin Zakariya University (PK), Prince Sultan University (SA), University of Wollongong (AU), Ara Institute of Canterbury (NZ), Charles Darwin University (AU), The Women University Multan (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.