Mapping the landscape of scientific research on suicide in South Africa: A Bibliometric Analysis

• Comprehensive bibliometric analysis of suicide research conducted using data from the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases spanning 1950-2025. • There is a gradual increase in suicide research outputs in South Africa over the past decade, with notable growth in the 2000s • Highly ranked and research-intensive institutions are leading in research outputs in SA • South Africa is collaborating with high-income countries on suicide research. Suicide is a major public health concern in South Africa, yet little is known about the patterns, trends, and collaborative networks shaping research output in this field. This study provides an overview of the current state of published scientific research on suicide in South Africa. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using data retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases through a comprehensive search strategy. Biblioshiny, an R-based bibliometric tool, was employed to analyse annual scientific production, contributing authors, institutions, and journal productivity. VOSviewer was used to perform co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses. The search strategy found 336 scientific documents authored by 730 researchers across 143 journals from 1950 to 2025. The study findings revealed a steady growth of suicide research, with notable increase in outputs over the past two decades. Research productivity was concentrated among a small group of authors, with Bantjes J, Stein D, and Meel B emerging as key contributors. Research in this field is primarily dominated by highly ranked institutions, with the University of Cape Town being the most productive, followed by Stellenbosch University. Local journals, including the South African Journal of Psychiatry and the South African Medical Journal, were the most frequent publication outlets, reflecting the importance of national platforms in disseminating suicide-related findings. International collaboration was evident, with strong partnerships established between South African institutions and high-income countries. Suicide research in SA is growing, but remains dominated by a limited number of authors and institutions. Strengthening research capacity, diversifying institutional contributions, and increasing funding are critical for expanding the scope and impact of suicide research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadr.2025.100989
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the landscape of scientific research on suicide in South Africa: A Bibliometric Analysis

Manganyi Charity Lebogang, Sodi Tholene
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Mapping the landscape of scientific research on suicide in South Africa: A Bibliometric Analysis

Manganyi Charity Lebogang, Sodi Tholene
article en

Abstract

• Comprehensive bibliometric analysis of suicide research conducted using data from the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases spanning 1950-2025. • There is a gradual increase in suicide research outputs in South Africa over the past decade, with notable growth in the 2000s • Highly ranked and research-intensive institutions are leading in research outputs in SA • South Africa is collaborating with high-income countries on suicide research. Suicide is a major public health concern in South Africa, yet little is known about the patterns, trends, and collaborative networks shaping research output in this field. This study provides an overview of the current state of published scientific research on suicide in South Africa. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using data retrieved from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed databases through a comprehensive search strategy. Biblioshiny, an R-based bibliometric tool, was employed to analyse annual scientific production, contributing authors, institutions, and journal productivity. VOSviewer was used to perform co-occurrence and co-authorship analyses. The search strategy found 336 scientific documents authored by 730 researchers across 143 journals from 1950 to 2025. The study findings revealed a steady growth of suicide research, with notable increase in outputs over the past two decades. Research productivity was concentrated among a small group of authors, with Bantjes J, Stein D, and Meel B emerging as key contributors. Research in this field is primarily dominated by highly ranked institutions, with the University of Cape Town being the most productive, followed by Stellenbosch University. Local journals, including the South African Journal of Psychiatry and the South African Medical Journal, were the most frequent publication outlets, reflecting the importance of national platforms in disseminating suicide-related findings. International collaboration was evident, with strong partnerships established between South African institutions and high-income countries. Suicide research in SA is growing, but remains dominated by a limited number of authors and institutions. Strengthening research capacity, diversifying institutional contributions, and increasing funding are critical for expanding the scope and impact of suicide research.

Journal of Affective Disorders ReportsVol. 22
University of Limpopo (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.