Association of hugs with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation: findings based on data from the general adult population in Germany

Abstract Aim To investigate the association between the frequency of hugs and probable depression, probable anxiety, and suicidal ideation in the German adult population. Subject and methods Cross-sectional data were used from the German general adult population aged 18 to 74 years (representative in terms of sex, age, and federal state) with n = 3270 that were obtained in an online survey in January 2025. The frequency of daily hugs served as the independent variable. Probable depression and anxiety were quantified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Suicidal ideation was assessed using the final item of the PHQ-9. Logistic regression was used to examine associations. Robustness checks were also conducted. Results Hugging others (on average one and two to three; compared to individuals not hugging others) on a daily basis is associated with lower odds of probable depression (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.83), probable anxiety (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95), and suicidal ideation (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85). Hugging on average two to three individuals daily was also associated with significantly lower odds for all outcomes, whereas hugging four or more individuals was only significantly associated with lower odds of probable depression. Conclusion Hugging one to three individuals each day may assist in preventing poor mental health. However, future longitudinal evidence is needed to confirm this.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-025-02627-6
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of hugs with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation: findings based on data from the general adult population in Germany

Larissa Zwar, Razak M. Gyasi, Dong Keon Yon, Andrew Stickley et al.
Journal of Public Health
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Association of hugs with depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation: findings based on data from the general adult population in Germany

Larissa Zwar, Razak M. Gyasi, Dong Keon Yon, Andrew Stickley, Hans‐Helmut König, André Hajek, Karl Peltzer, Supa Pengpid
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim To investigate the association between the frequency of hugs and probable depression, probable anxiety, and suicidal ideation in the German adult population. Subject and methods Cross-sectional data were used from the German general adult population aged 18 to 74 years (representative in terms of sex, age, and federal state) with n = 3270 that were obtained in an online survey in January 2025. The frequency of daily hugs served as the independent variable. Probable depression and anxiety were quantified using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) or Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), respectively. Suicidal ideation was assessed using the final item of the PHQ-9. Logistic regression was used to examine associations. Robustness checks were also conducted. Results Hugging others (on average one and two to three; compared to individuals not hugging others) on a daily basis is associated with lower odds of probable depression (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.83), probable anxiety (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95), and suicidal ideation (e.g., hugging one individual: OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.85). Hugging on average two to three individuals daily was also associated with significantly lower odds for all outcomes, whereas hugging four or more individuals was only significantly associated with lower odds of probable depression. Conclusion Hugging one to three individuals each day may assist in preventing poor mental health. However, future longitudinal evidence is needed to confirm this.

Journal of Public Health
Asia University (TW), Universität Hamburg (DE), China Medical University (TW), Brock University (CA), Mahidol University (TH), University of the Free State (ZA), Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (ZA), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Kyung Hee University Medical Center (KR), Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW), African Population and Health Research Center (KE), Southern Cross University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.