S. aureus biofilm disruption using ultrasound and microbubbles: Influence of radiation force, bubble dynamics and biofilm growth conditions

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is a human pathogen and a major cause of bloodstream infections, which can readily form biofilms on implanted medical devices. Here, we utilise a combination of lipid-shelled microbubbles (MBs) and ultrasound (US) to physically disperse the biofilm from the growth surface. The effects of two peak negative pressures (PNPs) and the direction of the acoustic radiation force (ARF) were evaluated. At 1.1 MHz, a clinically relevant frequency, and low PNP of 360 kPa, no significant biofilm dispersal occurred regardless of ultrasound (US) orientation. In contrast, at a high PNP of 2500 kPa, directing the ultrasound beam upward (US↑) pushed microbubbles (MBs) toward the biofilm, resulting in near-complete dispersal of the biofilm (94 ± 2 %) within the focal zone. Reversing direction to US↓, which pushes MBs away from the biofilm, reduced biofilm dispersal to 81 ± 3 %. Pre-treatment of the biofilm growth surface with fibrinogen or human plasma significantly altered the biofilm morphology and thickness, but did not affect the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubbles (US + MB)-mediated dispersal. Furthermore, multiple consecutive US + MB treatments could be applied to treat larger areas of biofilm without requiring MB replenishment between treatments. High-speed imaging was used to observe MB behaviour (e.g. translation and destruction) during US exposure. We revealed that the near instantaneous destruction of smaller MBs (∼1 μm) at high pressure did not induce significant biofilm dispersal and hypothesise that the translational motion of larger MBs (>10 μm) across the surface of the biofilm was the dominant mechanism behind biofilm dispersal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biofilm
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioflm.2025.100327
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S. aureus biofilm disruption using ultrasound and microbubbles: Influence of radiation force, bubble dynamics and biofilm growth conditions

Jonathan Sandoe, James R. McLaughlan, Amit D. Lad, Damien V. B. Batchelor et al.
1 citations
Biofilm
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
0.67
article

S. aureus biofilm disruption using ultrasound and microbubbles: Influence of radiation force, bubble dynamics and biofilm growth conditions

Jonathan Sandoe, James R. McLaughlan, Amit D. Lad, Damien V. B. Batchelor, W. Bruce Turnbull, Stephen D. Evans, Kathryn L Burr, Kristian Hollie
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> is a human pathogen and a major cause of bloodstream infections, which can readily form biofilms on implanted medical devices. Here, we utilise a combination of lipid-shelled microbubbles (MBs) and ultrasound (US) to physically disperse the biofilm from the growth surface. The effects of two peak negative pressures (PNPs) and the direction of the acoustic radiation force (ARF) were evaluated. At 1.1 MHz, a clinically relevant frequency, and low PNP of 360 kPa, no significant biofilm dispersal occurred regardless of ultrasound (US) orientation. In contrast, at a high PNP of 2500 kPa, directing the ultrasound beam upward (US↑) pushed microbubbles (MBs) toward the biofilm, resulting in near-complete dispersal of the biofilm (94 ± 2 %) within the focal zone. Reversing direction to US↓, which pushes MBs away from the biofilm, reduced biofilm dispersal to 81 ± 3 %. Pre-treatment of the biofilm growth surface with fibrinogen or human plasma significantly altered the biofilm morphology and thickness, but did not affect the efficiency of ultrasound and microbubbles (US + MB)-mediated dispersal. Furthermore, multiple consecutive US + MB treatments could be applied to treat larger areas of biofilm without requiring MB replenishment between treatments. High-speed imaging was used to observe MB behaviour (e.g. translation and destruction) during US exposure. We revealed that the near instantaneous destruction of smaller MBs (∼1 μm) at high pressure did not induce significant biofilm dispersal and hypothesise that the translational motion of larger MBs (>10 μm) across the surface of the biofilm was the dominant mechanism behind biofilm dispersal.

BiofilmVol. 10
University of Leeds (GB), St James's University Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.