Evaluating the emission impacts of agricultural subsidies policy in India

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the complex relationship between agricultural input subsidies and environmental sustainability in India. It specifically looks at how fertilizer, power and irrigation subsidies affect the environment and compares how much they contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming activities. Design/methodology/approach The study utilizes an autoregressive distributed lag model within a time-series framework, examining data from 1981 to 2020. The model delineates both the short-term and long-term interactions between input subsidies and GHG emissions, thereby quantifying the degree to which subsidized inputs exacerbate environmental externalities. Findings The results show that subsidies for fertilizer and power greatly raise emissions, with the power subsidy having the most intense emissions. The irrigation subsidy, on the other hand, has no effect on emissions. These results show that different parts of the subsidy have different effects on the environment. They also show the tradeoffs between making farming more productive and keeping the environment healthy. Research limitations/implications This study extends the subsidy–productivity framework by empirically linking input subsidies to greenhouse gas emissions, thereby illustrating a rebound effect akin to the Jevons Paradox in Indian agriculture. It highlights the need to incorporate environmental dimensions into existing theories that have traditionally focused only on yield enhancement and farmer welfare. Practical implications The findings underscore the need to redesign subsidy programs by gradually shifting away from inorganic fertilizer subsidies toward cash transfers that incentivize organic and low-carbon alternatives. Policymakers should integrate agri-environmental schemes, promote renewable energy use in farming and provide farmer training on climate-smart practices to align agricultural productivity goals with long-term sustainability. Originality/value This research provides original insights by measuring the varying emission intensities of agricultural input subsidies in India. The study provides a comprehensive framework by combining empirical evidence with policy implications, facilitating the formulation of environmentally sustainable agricultural policies that mitigate emissions while maintaining productivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Growth and Development Review
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/igdr-10-2024-0181
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the emission impacts of agricultural subsidies policy in India

Shadman Zafar
Indian Growth and Development Review
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Evaluating the emission impacts of agricultural subsidies policy in India

Shadman Zafar
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the complex relationship between agricultural input subsidies and environmental sustainability in India. It specifically looks at how fertilizer, power and irrigation subsidies affect the environment and compares how much they contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from farming activities. Design/methodology/approach The study utilizes an autoregressive distributed lag model within a time-series framework, examining data from 1981 to 2020. The model delineates both the short-term and long-term interactions between input subsidies and GHG emissions, thereby quantifying the degree to which subsidized inputs exacerbate environmental externalities. Findings The results show that subsidies for fertilizer and power greatly raise emissions, with the power subsidy having the most intense emissions. The irrigation subsidy, on the other hand, has no effect on emissions. These results show that different parts of the subsidy have different effects on the environment. They also show the tradeoffs between making farming more productive and keeping the environment healthy. Research limitations/implications This study extends the subsidy–productivity framework by empirically linking input subsidies to greenhouse gas emissions, thereby illustrating a rebound effect akin to the Jevons Paradox in Indian agriculture. It highlights the need to incorporate environmental dimensions into existing theories that have traditionally focused only on yield enhancement and farmer welfare. Practical implications The findings underscore the need to redesign subsidy programs by gradually shifting away from inorganic fertilizer subsidies toward cash transfers that incentivize organic and low-carbon alternatives. Policymakers should integrate agri-environmental schemes, promote renewable energy use in farming and provide farmer training on climate-smart practices to align agricultural productivity goals with long-term sustainability. Originality/value This research provides original insights by measuring the varying emission intensities of agricultural input subsidies in India. The study provides a comprehensive framework by combining empirical evidence with policy implications, facilitating the formulation of environmentally sustainable agricultural policies that mitigate emissions while maintaining productivity.

Indian Growth and Development ReviewVol. 19(1)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.