S206 Infectious Complications and Safety Outcomes in Cholangioscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Peroral cholangioscopy enables direct visualization of the biliary tree and has become increasingly utilized for the management of choledocholithiasis and indeterminate biliary strictures. However, concerns remain regarding post-procedural infectious complications, including bacteremia and cholangitis. Current guidelines offer limited guidance on prophylactic antibiotic use during cholangioscopy. We aimed to evaluate the pooled rates of bacteremia and other adverse events associated with cholangioscopy, assess procedural success, and examine the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025. Thirteen studies encompassing 4,413 cholangioscopy-guided procedures were included. Pooled proportions for technical/clinical success and adverse events were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses evaluated the role of pre-procedural antibiotic use and biopsy. Results: Pooled technical and clinical success rates were 97.3% (95% CI: 94.8%–98.6%) and 88.4% (95% CI: 80.5%–93.3%), respectively. Bacteremia was the most frequent infectious complication (6.8%; 95% CI: 3.1%–14.3%), followed by cholangitis (4.1%) and pancreatitis (3.6%). When adverse events were categorized using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon, mild events were most common (7.5%; 95% CI: 4.1%–13.2%; I² = 93%), with rare severe (0.7%) or fatal (0.4%) complications. Studies without pre-procedural antibiotics or those involving biopsy showed higher bacteremia rates. Despite widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, no consistent reduction in infectious complications was observed. Evidence of publication bias was detected (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Cholangioscopy is highly effective and generally safe; however, bacteremia remains a notable complication, particularly in high-risk patients and with biopsy use. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis remains unclear. Future studies should aim to standardize infection prevention protocols and define high-risk subgroups to optimize prophylactic strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127284.63625.a2
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S206 Infectious Complications and Safety Outcomes in Cholangioscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nirav C Thosani, Mehak Sachdeva, Prateek S. Harne, Sachindra Raj Joshi et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S206 Infectious Complications and Safety Outcomes in Cholangioscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nirav C Thosani, Mehak Sachdeva, Prateek S. Harne, Sachindra Raj Joshi, Vishali Moond, Akshay Sharma, Shivangini Duggal
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Peroral cholangioscopy enables direct visualization of the biliary tree and has become increasingly utilized for the management of choledocholithiasis and indeterminate biliary strictures. However, concerns remain regarding post-procedural infectious complications, including bacteremia and cholangitis. Current guidelines offer limited guidance on prophylactic antibiotic use during cholangioscopy. We aimed to evaluate the pooled rates of bacteremia and other adverse events associated with cholangioscopy, assess procedural success, and examine the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches were performed across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar through March 2025. Thirteen studies encompassing 4,413 cholangioscopy-guided procedures were included. Pooled proportions for technical/clinical success and adverse events were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses evaluated the role of pre-procedural antibiotic use and biopsy. Results: Pooled technical and clinical success rates were 97.3% (95% CI: 94.8%–98.6%) and 88.4% (95% CI: 80.5%–93.3%), respectively. Bacteremia was the most frequent infectious complication (6.8%; 95% CI: 3.1%–14.3%), followed by cholangitis (4.1%) and pancreatitis (3.6%). When adverse events were categorized using the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy lexicon, mild events were most common (7.5%; 95% CI: 4.1%–13.2%; I² = 93%), with rare severe (0.7%) or fatal (0.4%) complications. Studies without pre-procedural antibiotics or those involving biopsy showed higher bacteremia rates. Despite widespread use of prophylactic antibiotics, no consistent reduction in infectious complications was observed. Evidence of publication bias was detected (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Cholangioscopy is highly effective and generally safe; however, bacteremia remains a notable complication, particularly in high-risk patients and with biopsy use. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis remains unclear. Future studies should aim to standardize infection prevention protocols and define high-risk subgroups to optimize prophylactic strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.