S189 Timing of Intervention: Assessing Early vs Late Endoscopic and Surgical Interventions in Acute Cholangitis

Introduction: Acute cholangitis (AC) is characterized by infection and inflammation of the biliary tree, often resulting from acute biliary obstruction. This study evaluates outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the management of acute cholangitis, focusing on timing, complications, and hospital resource utilization. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2021, we identified AC hospitalizations. This population was further subdivided based on the timing into 4 groups, namely urgent (within 24 hours), early (24-48 hours), late (>48 hours), or no ERCP/LCBDE. Outcomes included all-cause 30-day readmission rate, length of stay in the hospital, total cost (adjusted to inflation in 2021), and in-hospital mortality. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Between 2016 to 2021, A total of 31,817 patients were included, with 30,330 (95.3%) undergoing ERCP and 1,487 (4.67%) undergoing LCBDE. ERCP patients were older (mean age 64.5 vs 59.7 years; P < 0.001) with higher Medicare use (56.1% vs 48.1%) compared to LCBDE patients. LCBDE patients had more elective admissions (19.6% vs 11.7%; P < 0.001) and were treated more often in non-teaching hospitals (P < 0.001). Complication rates differed significantly: LCBDE patients had higher respiratory failure (3.34% vs 2.34%; P = 0.026) and bile duct perforation (1.55% vs 0.64%; P = 0.026), while ERCP patients had higher rates of pancreatitis (P < 0.001) and jaundice (P = 0.002). Late ERCP was associated with higher rates of septic shock (1.23%), respiratory failure (3.80%), and bile duct perforation (0.93%) compared to earlier timing. Patients undergoing late ERCP also had longer hospital stays and higher costs (P < 0.001). LCBDE patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays (mean 8.92 vs 4.89 days) and higher costs, particularly in late interventions (P < 0.001). Conclusion: ERCP remains the preferred intervention for AC, with earlier procedures resulting in better outcomes and lower resource utilization. LCBDE, while less common, is associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs, particularly when performed late. Optimizing timing for both ERCP and LCBDE is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare expenditures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127216.34034.02
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S189 Timing of Intervention: Assessing Early vs Late Endoscopic and Surgical Interventions in Acute Cholangitis

Paul Kang, Silpa Choday, Neil Vyas, Jad Alsheikh
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

S189 Timing of Intervention: Assessing Early vs Late Endoscopic and Surgical Interventions in Acute Cholangitis

Paul Kang, Silpa Choday, Neil Vyas, Jad Alsheikh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute cholangitis (AC) is characterized by infection and inflammation of the biliary tree, often resulting from acute biliary obstruction. This study evaluates outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in the management of acute cholangitis, focusing on timing, complications, and hospital resource utilization. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2016 to 2021, we identified AC hospitalizations. This population was further subdivided based on the timing into 4 groups, namely urgent (within 24 hours), early (24-48 hours), late (>48 hours), or no ERCP/LCBDE. Outcomes included all-cause 30-day readmission rate, length of stay in the hospital, total cost (adjusted to inflation in 2021), and in-hospital mortality. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Between 2016 to 2021, A total of 31,817 patients were included, with 30,330 (95.3%) undergoing ERCP and 1,487 (4.67%) undergoing LCBDE. ERCP patients were older (mean age 64.5 vs 59.7 years; P < 0.001) with higher Medicare use (56.1% vs 48.1%) compared to LCBDE patients. LCBDE patients had more elective admissions (19.6% vs 11.7%; P < 0.001) and were treated more often in non-teaching hospitals (P < 0.001). Complication rates differed significantly: LCBDE patients had higher respiratory failure (3.34% vs 2.34%; P = 0.026) and bile duct perforation (1.55% vs 0.64%; P = 0.026), while ERCP patients had higher rates of pancreatitis (P < 0.001) and jaundice (P = 0.002). Late ERCP was associated with higher rates of septic shock (1.23%), respiratory failure (3.80%), and bile duct perforation (0.93%) compared to earlier timing. Patients undergoing late ERCP also had longer hospital stays and higher costs (P < 0.001). LCBDE patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays (mean 8.92 vs 4.89 days) and higher costs, particularly in late interventions (P < 0.001). Conclusion: ERCP remains the preferred intervention for AC, with earlier procedures resulting in better outcomes and lower resource utilization. LCBDE, while less common, is associated with longer hospital stays and higher costs, particularly when performed late. Optimizing timing for both ERCP and LCBDE is critical to improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare expenditures.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.