S222 Risk of Pancreatic Cyst in Genetic High-Risk Group Among Patients From EUS Pancreas Registry

Introduction: Pancreatic cysts and certain genetically high-risk (GHR) groups are routinely under surveillance/screening for pancreatic cancer early detection. The degree of influence of pancreatic cysts in genetically high-risk groups requires further characterization for future management. Here we describe the comparison of groups with either genetic-risks and/or suspected pancreatic mucinous cysts from the institutional EUS Pancreas Registry. Methods: Data were obtained from the institutional IRB-approved EUS Pancreas Registry for pancreatic disease. Three groups were examined: GHR individuals (family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or presence of high-risk genetic mutations) without cysts (Group 1), GHR individuals with cysts (Group 2), and individuals with a history of pancreatic cysts alone (Group 3). Fukuoka and Kyoto guideline risk features were counted and summed for each case and metric was calculated for per-year risk feature development. Those with pancreatitis related cysts, serous cysts, neuroendocrine tumor, pancreaticobiliary cancer without cyst were excluded. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni correction) were performed using SPSS v30. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Of 220 patients (63.6% women; mean age 62.5 years), racial breakdown included 78.2% Caucasian, 8.2% Asian, 8.2% Hispanic, and 5.4% African American. Cancer or high-grade dysplasia was found in 0 of 49 cases (0%) in Group 1, 3 of 27 cases (11.1%) in Group 2, and 30 of 144 cases (20.8%) in Group 3. Guideline-based risk scoring showed no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2. However, significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 3 (Fukuoka (P = 0.002) and Kyoto (P = 0.000)). Group 2 and Group 3 also showed significant differences (Fukuoka (P = 0.007) and Kyoto (P = 0.043)). Conclusion: An increasing trend of the observed cancer is seen in association with pancreatic cyst formation. Risk-feature-based scoring demonstrated significant differences under both the Fukuoka and Kyoto guidelines between the pancreatic cyst alone group and GHR groups (with and without cyst). The current risk-feature based strategy, however, did not definitively distinguish the risk of having a cyst within the GHR group. These findings highlight the potential value of data analysis in stratifying cancer risk and underscore the need for further research to refine risk assessment strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127348.30639.b0
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S222 Risk of Pancreatic Cyst in Genetic High-Risk Group Among Patients From EUS Pancreas Registry

Aida Nasirishargh, Shiro Urayama, Jiten Desai
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

S222 Risk of Pancreatic Cyst in Genetic High-Risk Group Among Patients From EUS Pancreas Registry

Aida Nasirishargh, Shiro Urayama, Jiten Desai
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cysts and certain genetically high-risk (GHR) groups are routinely under surveillance/screening for pancreatic cancer early detection. The degree of influence of pancreatic cysts in genetically high-risk groups requires further characterization for future management. Here we describe the comparison of groups with either genetic-risks and/or suspected pancreatic mucinous cysts from the institutional EUS Pancreas Registry. Methods: Data were obtained from the institutional IRB-approved EUS Pancreas Registry for pancreatic disease. Three groups were examined: GHR individuals (family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or presence of high-risk genetic mutations) without cysts (Group 1), GHR individuals with cysts (Group 2), and individuals with a history of pancreatic cysts alone (Group 3). Fukuoka and Kyoto guideline risk features were counted and summed for each case and metric was calculated for per-year risk feature development. Those with pancreatitis related cysts, serous cysts, neuroendocrine tumor, pancreaticobiliary cancer without cyst were excluded. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis with Bonferroni correction) were performed using SPSS v30. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: Of 220 patients (63.6% women; mean age 62.5 years), racial breakdown included 78.2% Caucasian, 8.2% Asian, 8.2% Hispanic, and 5.4% African American. Cancer or high-grade dysplasia was found in 0 of 49 cases (0%) in Group 1, 3 of 27 cases (11.1%) in Group 2, and 30 of 144 cases (20.8%) in Group 3. Guideline-based risk scoring showed no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2. However, significant differences were observed between Groups 1 and 3 (Fukuoka (P = 0.002) and Kyoto (P = 0.000)). Group 2 and Group 3 also showed significant differences (Fukuoka (P = 0.007) and Kyoto (P = 0.043)). Conclusion: An increasing trend of the observed cancer is seen in association with pancreatic cyst formation. Risk-feature-based scoring demonstrated significant differences under both the Fukuoka and Kyoto guidelines between the pancreatic cyst alone group and GHR groups (with and without cyst). The current risk-feature based strategy, however, did not definitively distinguish the risk of having a cyst within the GHR group. These findings highlight the potential value of data analysis in stratifying cancer risk and underscore the need for further research to refine risk assessment strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.