S243 Comparative Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Hypertriglyceridemia Patients Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Introduction: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used antidiabetic agents with demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits. However, their comparative safety profiles regarding pancreatitis and lipid disorders remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the 1-year risk of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia among users of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the TriNetX Research Network. Adults who initiated either an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist were identified and followed for 1 year. After 1:1 propensity-score matching for baseline demographics and comorbidities, 22,042 patients were included in each cohort. Primary outcomes were the incidence of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia, defined by ICD-10 codes. Risk comparisons were assessed using odds ratios, risk differences, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for medication type. Results: In propensity-score–matched cohorts of 22,042 patients per arm, the incidence of acute pancreatitis was higher in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists, acute pancreatitis occurred in 0.349% of the SGLT2 users vs 0.263% of the GLP-1 RA (odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 0.95–1.87; P = 0.10). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for individual medications, For SGLT2 inhibitors, the adjusted hazard ratios were: canagliflozin (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9844), dapagliflozin (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.45–3.28; P = 0.6982), empagliflozin (aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34–1.73; P = 0.5249), and ertugliflozin (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9954). For GLP-1 receptor agonists, results included: albiglutide (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9962), dulaglutide (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63–2.25; P = 0.5968), semaglutide (aHR 1.58, 95% CI 0.81–3.10; P = 0.1808), liraglutide (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.24–1.45; P = 0.2501), and exenatide (aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.17; P = 0.2348). Conclusion: In this large real-world matched cohort study, the risk of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia did not differ significantly between SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist users. While male sex and older age were independently associated with pancreatitis risk, no individual agent demonstrated a statistically significant association. These findings support the pancreatic safety of both classes in routine practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127432.56625.2e
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S243 Comparative Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Hypertriglyceridemia Patients Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Wesam Frandah, Bisher Mustafa, Abdallah Hussein, Ahmed Sherif et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

S243 Comparative Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Hypertriglyceridemia Patients Treated With SGLT2 Inhibitors vs GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis

Wesam Frandah, Bisher Mustafa, Abdallah Hussein, Ahmed Sherif, Ibrahim Shanti, Islam Rajab
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are widely used antidiabetic agents with demonstrated cardiovascular and renal benefits. However, their comparative safety profiles regarding pancreatitis and lipid disorders remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the 1-year risk of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia among users of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using data from the TriNetX Research Network. Adults who initiated either an SGLT2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 receptor agonist were identified and followed for 1 year. After 1:1 propensity-score matching for baseline demographics and comorbidities, 22,042 patients were included in each cohort. Primary outcomes were the incidence of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia, defined by ICD-10 codes. Risk comparisons were assessed using odds ratios, risk differences, and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for medication type. Results: In propensity-score–matched cohorts of 22,042 patients per arm, the incidence of acute pancreatitis was higher in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists, acute pancreatitis occurred in 0.349% of the SGLT2 users vs 0.263% of the GLP-1 RA (odds ratio 1.33, 95% CI 0.95–1.87; P = 0.10). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for individual medications, For SGLT2 inhibitors, the adjusted hazard ratios were: canagliflozin (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9844), dapagliflozin (aHR 1.22, 95% CI 0.45–3.28; P = 0.6982), empagliflozin (aHR 0.77, 95% CI 0.34–1.73; P = 0.5249), and ertugliflozin (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9954). For GLP-1 receptor agonists, results included: albiglutide (aHR <0.0001, 95% CI 0–0; P = 0.9962), dulaglutide (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 0.63–2.25; P = 0.5968), semaglutide (aHR 1.58, 95% CI 0.81–3.10; P = 0.1808), liraglutide (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.24–1.45; P = 0.2501), and exenatide (aHR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04–2.17; P = 0.2348). Conclusion: In this large real-world matched cohort study, the risk of acute pancreatitis and hypertriglyceridemia did not differ significantly between SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist users. While male sex and older age were independently associated with pancreatitis risk, no individual agent demonstrated a statistically significant association. These findings support the pancreatic safety of both classes in routine practice.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.