S232 Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) have remained the standard first-line regimen for over a decade. However, response rates are modest, prompting interest in more active regimens. FOLFIRINOX, a triplet chemotherapy regimen originally developed for pancreatic cancer, has shown potential in BTC, but its role is not well defined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line FOLFIRINOX in advanced BTC through a single-arm meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that evaluated FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced BTC. A total of 184 patients were analyzed across 4 studies. The sample included 80 women and 104 men with mean ages ranging from 49.9 to 65.6 years. Primary outcomes were complete response, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events such as anemia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model, and forest plots were used to assess consistency across studies. Results: The pooled complete response rate was 2.9% (95% CI: 1.2–6.7%), with all studies showing statistically significant contributions to the overall estimate (Z-values from –2.29 to –5.81, P < 0.05). Mean progression-free survival was 6.66 months (95% CI: 6.59–6.74), with a narrow confidence interval and minimal variance across studies, suggesting consistent disease control. Mean overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI: 13.25–21.97). Hematologic toxicity was common: anemia occurred in 71.4% (95% CI: 63–78.6%), fatigue in 67.7% (95% CI: 58.3–75.9%), and thrombocytopenia in 61.8% (95% CI: 53.5–69.5%). These adverse events were largely grade ≥2, highlighting a need for careful supportive care during treatment. Conclusion: FOLFIRINOX demonstrates modest but consistent survival benefits in patients with advanced BTC, with a low rate of complete response but meaningful disease stabilization. However, the high incidence of hematologic toxicity emphasizes the importance of patient selection and monitoring. These findings suggest that FOLFIRINOX may be a viable first-line option for fit patients with advanced BTC, but further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001127388.48260.53
Primary Topic
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S232 Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Mohammad Adam, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Marina Takawy et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
article

S232 Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Mohammad Adam, Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Marina Takawy, Mohamad Elgozair, Mohammed Y. Youssef, Ahmed Mohamed
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Biliary tract cancer (BTC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) have remained the standard first-line regimen for over a decade. However, response rates are modest, prompting interest in more active regimens. FOLFIRINOX, a triplet chemotherapy regimen originally developed for pancreatic cancer, has shown potential in BTC, but its role is not well defined. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line FOLFIRINOX in advanced BTC through a single-arm meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including studies that evaluated FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced BTC. A total of 184 patients were analyzed across 4 studies. The sample included 80 women and 104 men with mean ages ranging from 49.9 to 65.6 years. Primary outcomes were complete response, overall survival, and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes included treatment-related adverse events such as anemia, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Pooled estimates were generated using a random-effects model, and forest plots were used to assess consistency across studies. Results: The pooled complete response rate was 2.9% (95% CI: 1.2–6.7%), with all studies showing statistically significant contributions to the overall estimate (Z-values from –2.29 to –5.81, P < 0.05). Mean progression-free survival was 6.66 months (95% CI: 6.59–6.74), with a narrow confidence interval and minimal variance across studies, suggesting consistent disease control. Mean overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI: 13.25–21.97). Hematologic toxicity was common: anemia occurred in 71.4% (95% CI: 63–78.6%), fatigue in 67.7% (95% CI: 58.3–75.9%), and thrombocytopenia in 61.8% (95% CI: 53.5–69.5%). These adverse events were largely grade ≥2, highlighting a need for careful supportive care during treatment. Conclusion: FOLFIRINOX demonstrates modest but consistent survival benefits in patients with advanced BTC, with a low rate of complete response but meaningful disease stabilization. However, the high incidence of hematologic toxicity emphasizes the importance of patient selection and monitoring. These findings suggest that FOLFIRINOX may be a viable first-line option for fit patients with advanced BTC, but further prospective studies are needed to confirm these results and identify which patients are most likely to benefit.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.