S278 The Incidence of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following an Index Episode of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of United States Collaborative Network Data

Introduction: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), a severe form of acute pancreatitis, can lead to long-term metabolic complications including exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), which may cause weight loss, steatorrhea, and associated conditions such as anemia and osteoporosis which arise as a consequence of malabsorption. The incidence of EPI after acute pancreatitis has been previously described in small single- and multi-center cohort studies; however, the comparative long-term incidence of EPI in ANP and acute interstitial pancreatitis patients using real-world nationally representative data has not been previously quantified. Methods: We searched the United States Collaborative Network on the platform TriNetX from inception to May 23, 2025 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes appropriate to ANP and acute interstitial pancreatitis. We identified all patients with a documented fecal elastase value less than 200 ug/L placed on pancreatic enzymes supplementation during a 12-month follow-up period. One-to-one propensity score matching was carried out based on demographic variables and all comorbidities associated with malabsorption. The primary outcome (EPI) was calculated and expressed as an odds ratio along with a 95% CI. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided P-value < 0.05. Results: Our database search found 148,135 patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and EPI in the follow-up window. After propensity-score matching was carried out, 17,176 patients were included into our study (8,588 patients in each cohort). We found an EPI incidence of 8.7% in the ANP cohort over the follow-up period, compared to an EPI incidence of 2.2% in the acute interstitial pancreatitis cohort. There were increased odds of EPI in patients with an index episode of ANP compared to patients with acute interstitial pancreatitis (odds ratio 4.2, 95% CI 3.595, 4.991, P = 0.000). Conclusion: There are significantly higher odds of developing EPI in patients with ANP over a 12-month period compared to patients with acute interstitial pancreatitis. Our findings highlight the importance of careful long-term monitoring for EPI to prevent downstream malabsorption-related complications in this patient population. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128572.37935.7d
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S278 The Incidence of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following an Index Episode of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of United States Collaborative Network Data

Hussein Baydoun, Indira Bhavsar-Burke, Mohammad Al‐Haddad, Itegbemie Obaitan et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S278 The Incidence of Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Following an Index Episode of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of United States Collaborative Network Data

Hussein Baydoun, Indira Bhavsar-Burke, Mohammad Al‐Haddad, Itegbemie Obaitan, Mahmoud Yousef, Daryl Ramai, Azizullah Beran, Aladdin Dahbour, Ujwala Pamidimukkala, Mina Batarseh, Awais Ahmed, Nasir Saleem, Vikram Ram Rajagopalan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP), a severe form of acute pancreatitis, can lead to long-term metabolic complications including exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI), which may cause weight loss, steatorrhea, and associated conditions such as anemia and osteoporosis which arise as a consequence of malabsorption. The incidence of EPI after acute pancreatitis has been previously described in small single- and multi-center cohort studies; however, the comparative long-term incidence of EPI in ANP and acute interstitial pancreatitis patients using real-world nationally representative data has not been previously quantified. Methods: We searched the United States Collaborative Network on the platform TriNetX from inception to May 23, 2025 using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes appropriate to ANP and acute interstitial pancreatitis. We identified all patients with a documented fecal elastase value less than 200 ug/L placed on pancreatic enzymes supplementation during a 12-month follow-up period. One-to-one propensity score matching was carried out based on demographic variables and all comorbidities associated with malabsorption. The primary outcome (EPI) was calculated and expressed as an odds ratio along with a 95% CI. Statistical significance was defined as a 2-sided P-value < 0.05. Results: Our database search found 148,135 patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and EPI in the follow-up window. After propensity-score matching was carried out, 17,176 patients were included into our study (8,588 patients in each cohort). We found an EPI incidence of 8.7% in the ANP cohort over the follow-up period, compared to an EPI incidence of 2.2% in the acute interstitial pancreatitis cohort. There were increased odds of EPI in patients with an index episode of ANP compared to patients with acute interstitial pancreatitis (odds ratio 4.2, 95% CI 3.595, 4.991, P = 0.000). Conclusion: There are significantly higher odds of developing EPI in patients with ANP over a 12-month period compared to patients with acute interstitial pancreatitis. Our findings highlight the importance of careful long-term monitoring for EPI to prevent downstream malabsorption-related complications in this patient population. Prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.