S292 Low Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Malnutrition and systemic inflammation aggravate acute pancreatitis (AP). The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) summarizes both processes; however, its ability to predict mortality and disease severity in AP has not been synthesized. Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed and Google Scholar for all articles through May 2025. Of 70 titles and abstracts screened, 7 full texts were assessed and 5 were selected for detailed review. Two reviewers independently performed all steps of screening and bias assessment, with any discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity in PNI cut-offs and effect metrics; findings were therefore narratively synthesized. Results: We analyzed 5 observational studies with a total of 1691 patients with AP. PNI was measured on admission in 5 cohorts and at 48 hours in 1 and on day 3 and day 7 in 1 study. Three studies (n = 1059) reported mortality. Li et al. (2017) reported that mean admission PNI was 41.7 ± 7.5 in survivors vs 34.0 ± 6.4 in non-survivors (P < 0.001); PNI ≤33.1 yielded an AUC of 0.781 and retained significance after adjustment (odd ratio [OR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.59). Akkuzu et al. observed 8 deaths among 210 patients with PNI <45 vs none among 151 with PNI ≥45 (crude OR 21.3, 95% CI 4.8-93.5). Efgan et al., using PNI as a continuous covariate, reported AUC of 0.758 for cut-off ≤43.45 and adjusted HR of 1.055 (1.003-1.156) per unit decrease. For severity, Li et al. found PNI <41.1 independently associated with severe AP (OR 7.75, 3.40-17.68). Pian et al. showed decreasing median PNI throughout the initial 48 hours with minimal improvement by the end of the week in severe cases and a day-3 AUC of 0.814 for the cut-off 40.63. Akkuzu et al. showed that severe AP occurred in 31% of low-PNI vs 1% of high-PNI patients (P < 0.001); and Shi et al. (2025) demonstrated day-2 PNI ≤38.53 predicted severity (AUC 0.871) with adjusted OR 0.82 (0.75-0.90). Across all studies, PNI at 48 hours was most predictive of the mortality/severity of AP. Conclusion: Across 1691 patients, lower PNI consistently predicted higher in-hospital mortality and greater disease severity. Given its derivation from routinely available labs, PNI offers a low-cost, accessible tool for early risk stratification. Although consistent, multicenter prospective studies using standardized PNI measurement are warranted to validate its bedside prognostic utility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128628.49093.39
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S292 Low Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review

Samir Vanani, Rahul Bakhle, Mipasha Patel, Nandan Patel
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S292 Low Prognostic Nutritional Index as a Predictor of Mortality and Severity in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review

Samir Vanani, Rahul Bakhle, Mipasha Patel, Nandan Patel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Malnutrition and systemic inflammation aggravate acute pancreatitis (AP). The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) summarizes both processes; however, its ability to predict mortality and disease severity in AP has not been synthesized. Methods: A literature search was conducted across PubMed and Google Scholar for all articles through May 2025. Of 70 titles and abstracts screened, 7 full texts were assessed and 5 were selected for detailed review. Two reviewers independently performed all steps of screening and bias assessment, with any discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Meta-analysis was precluded by heterogeneity in PNI cut-offs and effect metrics; findings were therefore narratively synthesized. Results: We analyzed 5 observational studies with a total of 1691 patients with AP. PNI was measured on admission in 5 cohorts and at 48 hours in 1 and on day 3 and day 7 in 1 study. Three studies (n = 1059) reported mortality. Li et al. (2017) reported that mean admission PNI was 41.7 ± 7.5 in survivors vs 34.0 ± 6.4 in non-survivors (P < 0.001); PNI ≤33.1 yielded an AUC of 0.781 and retained significance after adjustment (odd ratio [OR] 2.64, 95% CI 1.25-5.59). Akkuzu et al. observed 8 deaths among 210 patients with PNI <45 vs none among 151 with PNI ≥45 (crude OR 21.3, 95% CI 4.8-93.5). Efgan et al., using PNI as a continuous covariate, reported AUC of 0.758 for cut-off ≤43.45 and adjusted HR of 1.055 (1.003-1.156) per unit decrease. For severity, Li et al. found PNI <41.1 independently associated with severe AP (OR 7.75, 3.40-17.68). Pian et al. showed decreasing median PNI throughout the initial 48 hours with minimal improvement by the end of the week in severe cases and a day-3 AUC of 0.814 for the cut-off 40.63. Akkuzu et al. showed that severe AP occurred in 31% of low-PNI vs 1% of high-PNI patients (P < 0.001); and Shi et al. (2025) demonstrated day-2 PNI ≤38.53 predicted severity (AUC 0.871) with adjusted OR 0.82 (0.75-0.90). Across all studies, PNI at 48 hours was most predictive of the mortality/severity of AP. Conclusion: Across 1691 patients, lower PNI consistently predicted higher in-hospital mortality and greater disease severity. Given its derivation from routinely available labs, PNI offers a low-cost, accessible tool for early risk stratification. Although consistent, multicenter prospective studies using standardized PNI measurement are warranted to validate its bedside prognostic utility.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.