S334 Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Has Poorer Outcomes in Young Adults Diagnosed With Colorectal Carcinoma: A SEER Database Study With Propensity Score Matching

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the U.S. and is increasingly diagnosed in younger adults (aged <50 years). CRC can have diverse histological presentations, most commonly adenocarcinoma (AC), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA). Prior literature has shown that CRC with SRCC histology in older adults (>50 years) has poor outcomes. CRC in young adults (<50 years) is also associated with poorer survival outcomes, data on differences in clinical outcomes based on different histopathological subtypes are limited. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 database 2023 submission, to identify patients aged 20-49 years, diagnosed with CRC between 2000 and 2021, with histology showing AC (8,140, 8,210-11, 8,220-21, 8,255, 8,260-8263), MA (8,480-8,481), and SRCC (8,490). Data on various baseline characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were extracted using SEERStat software. Statistical analysis, including Pearson’s Chi-Square Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively, was done using BlueSky Statistics Version 10.3.4. 1:1 propensity score matching was done between AC and SRCC patients to neutralize the confounding factors with a matching tolerance at 0.25, using R Studio (version 4.3.1). A significance level of P < 0.05 was applied. Results: We identified 59,991 patients aged 20-49 diagnosed with colorectal cancer, with histology showing AC (90.7%), MA (7.6%), and SRCC (1.7%). Propensity matching generated cohorts of 688 patients with AC and SRCC. Survival outcomes were significantly poor for SRCC patients, including overall survival (26.2% in unmatched and 28.1% in matched cohort), cancer-related mortality (93.7% in unmatched and 95.7% in matched cohort), median survival time (18 months in unmatched and 21 months in matched cohort), and 5-year mortality rate (82.5% in unmatched and 78.5% in matched cohort). Conclusion: Our study concludes that patients with SRCC histology patterns have significantly poorer outcomes than other most common histology patterns. These outcomes highlight the necessity for customized treatment approaches, especially for younger patients dealing with less advantageous subtypes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128796.62315.2d
Primary Topic
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S334 Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Has Poorer Outcomes in Young Adults Diagnosed With Colorectal Carcinoma: A SEER Database Study With Propensity Score Matching

Lovekirat Dhaliwal, Sudha Pandit, Rishi Chowdhary, Rohit Goyal et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
article

S334 Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Has Poorer Outcomes in Young Adults Diagnosed With Colorectal Carcinoma: A SEER Database Study With Propensity Score Matching

Lovekirat Dhaliwal, Sudha Pandit, Rishi Chowdhary, Rohit Goyal, Karan Sachdeva, Shruti Jain, Anjul Verma
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the U.S. and is increasingly diagnosed in younger adults (aged <50 years). CRC can have diverse histological presentations, most commonly adenocarcinoma (AC), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), and mucinous adenocarcinoma (MA). Prior literature has shown that CRC with SRCC histology in older adults (>50 years) has poor outcomes. CRC in young adults (<50 years) is also associated with poorer survival outcomes, data on differences in clinical outcomes based on different histopathological subtypes are limited. Methods: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 database 2023 submission, to identify patients aged 20-49 years, diagnosed with CRC between 2000 and 2021, with histology showing AC (8,140, 8,210-11, 8,220-21, 8,255, 8,260-8263), MA (8,480-8,481), and SRCC (8,490). Data on various baseline characteristics, tumor features, and outcomes were extracted using SEERStat software. Statistical analysis, including Pearson’s Chi-Square Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test to analyze categorical and continuous variables, respectively, was done using BlueSky Statistics Version 10.3.4. 1:1 propensity score matching was done between AC and SRCC patients to neutralize the confounding factors with a matching tolerance at 0.25, using R Studio (version 4.3.1). A significance level of P < 0.05 was applied. Results: We identified 59,991 patients aged 20-49 diagnosed with colorectal cancer, with histology showing AC (90.7%), MA (7.6%), and SRCC (1.7%). Propensity matching generated cohorts of 688 patients with AC and SRCC. Survival outcomes were significantly poor for SRCC patients, including overall survival (26.2% in unmatched and 28.1% in matched cohort), cancer-related mortality (93.7% in unmatched and 95.7% in matched cohort), median survival time (18 months in unmatched and 21 months in matched cohort), and 5-year mortality rate (82.5% in unmatched and 78.5% in matched cohort). Conclusion: Our study concludes that patients with SRCC histology patterns have significantly poorer outcomes than other most common histology patterns. These outcomes highlight the necessity for customized treatment approaches, especially for younger patients dealing with less advantageous subtypes.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.