S293 Impact of Prior Bariatric Surgery on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis of Inpatient Morbidity, Mortality, and Resource Utilization

Introduction: Rising obesity rates increase demand for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in post-bariatric surgery patients. Altered anatomy poses technical challenges, yet large-scale outcome data are limited. We compared ERCP outcomes between patients with/without bariatric surgery history. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 2019 NIS data using ICD-10 codes. Included adults undergoing ERCP. Primary outcomes: mortality, length of stay, total charges. Analyzed with STATA/SE 18.0. Results: Among 178,785 ERCP patients, 2,910 had prior bariatric surgery. The post-bariatric cohort was predominantly women (73.7%) and White (75%). Compared to non-bariatric patients, they experienced- Longer mean length of stay (5.1 vs 4.3 days), higher charges ($83,183 vs $59,550), 13.8-fold increased pancreatitis risk (adjusted odds ratio 13.8, 95% CI 9.33–20.61; P < 0.05). No significant differences in mortality or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusion: This largest-to-date analysis reveals post-bariatric patients face substantially higher pancreatitis risk and resource utilization after ERCP, likely due to anatomical complexity. Despite comparable mortality/bleeding rates, the dramatic pancreatitis increase demands prophylactic strategies (e.g., rectal NSAIDs). Limitations include retrospective design and coding dependencies. Enhanced prevention protocols are essential for this growing population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128632.35506.77
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S293 Impact of Prior Bariatric Surgery on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis of Inpatient Morbidity, Mortality, and Resource Utilization

Anirudhha Pratap Singh, Anusha Kavarthapu, Srikaran Bojja, A Qasim
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

S293 Impact of Prior Bariatric Surgery on Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Outcomes: A Nationwide Analysis of Inpatient Morbidity, Mortality, and Resource Utilization

Anirudhha Pratap Singh, Anusha Kavarthapu, Srikaran Bojja, A Qasim
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Rising obesity rates increase demand for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in post-bariatric surgery patients. Altered anatomy poses technical challenges, yet large-scale outcome data are limited. We compared ERCP outcomes between patients with/without bariatric surgery history. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 2019 NIS data using ICD-10 codes. Included adults undergoing ERCP. Primary outcomes: mortality, length of stay, total charges. Analyzed with STATA/SE 18.0. Results: Among 178,785 ERCP patients, 2,910 had prior bariatric surgery. The post-bariatric cohort was predominantly women (73.7%) and White (75%). Compared to non-bariatric patients, they experienced- Longer mean length of stay (5.1 vs 4.3 days), higher charges ($83,183 vs $59,550), 13.8-fold increased pancreatitis risk (adjusted odds ratio 13.8, 95% CI 9.33–20.61; P < 0.05). No significant differences in mortality or gastrointestinal bleeding. Conclusion: This largest-to-date analysis reveals post-bariatric patients face substantially higher pancreatitis risk and resource utilization after ERCP, likely due to anatomical complexity. Despite comparable mortality/bleeding rates, the dramatic pancreatitis increase demands prophylactic strategies (e.g., rectal NSAIDs). Limitations include retrospective design and coding dependencies. Enhanced prevention protocols are essential for this growing population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.