S309 Referral Roadblocks: Underutilization of Genetic Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Loss of MLH-1 and PMS-2

Introduction: Mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry is a standard part of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics, used to identify patients at risk for Lynch syndrome (LS). When tumors show loss of MLH1 and PMS2, testing for BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation helps distinguish sporadic cases from LS. If negative, current guidelines recommend referral to genetic counseling and germline testing. Despite clear recommendations, adherence remains inconsistent. This study evaluated referral patterns, testing completion, and barriers among eligible patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss across a multi-center system. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 102 CRC patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss between January 2022 and December 2024. After excluding patients with BRAF mutation or MLH1 hypermethylation, 64 were eligible. Demographics, immunohistochemical findings, referral/testing outcomes, and documented barriers were collected. Chi-square tests assessed differences in referral and counseling completion by site of care. Results: Among the 64 eligible patients, mean age was 70; 55% were women. The cohort included 53% White, 37.7% African American, and 9.3% Asian patients. A history of other cancers was documented in 25%, with breast cancer in 33% of those. A total of 23 patients (35.9%) were seen at a university hospital and 41 (64.1%) at community hospitals. MLH1 loss was seen in 69% and PMS2 loss in 71.8%. Only 24 patients (37.5%) were referred to genetic counseling—10 of 23 (43.5%) at the university site and 14 of 41 (34.1%) at community sites. Of those referred, 13 (54.2%) completed germline testing—6 at the university and 7 at community sites—representing 20.3% of all eligible patients. Referral rates did not differ significantly between sites (χ² = 0.026, P = 0.871), nor did completion rates (χ² = 0.725, P = 0.394). The most common barrier was lack of provider initiation (63%). Patient-related barriers, including language, transportation, and relocation, were noted in 23%. Conclusion: Despite eligibility, fewer than 40% were referred, and only one in 5 completed testing. Referral and testing rates were slightly higher at the university site but remained suboptimal. Lack of provider referral was the main barrier, though social determinants contributed. These findings highlight the need for systems-based solutions—automated referrals, provider education, and navigation support—to improve LS evaluation and reduce disparities in access to genetic services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128696.92031.ba
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S309 Referral Roadblocks: Underutilization of Genetic Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Loss of MLH-1 and PMS-2

Rashmi Samdani, Priyanka Kanth, Qusai Al Zureikat, Ruben Alberto Hiraldo et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

S309 Referral Roadblocks: Underutilization of Genetic Evaluation in Colorectal Cancer Patients With Loss of MLH-1 and PMS-2

Rashmi Samdani, Priyanka Kanth, Qusai Al Zureikat, Ruben Alberto Hiraldo, Samuel Speizman
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Mismatch repair (MMR) immunohistochemistry is a standard part of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics, used to identify patients at risk for Lynch syndrome (LS). When tumors show loss of MLH1 and PMS2, testing for BRAF mutation or MLH1 promoter hypermethylation helps distinguish sporadic cases from LS. If negative, current guidelines recommend referral to genetic counseling and germline testing. Despite clear recommendations, adherence remains inconsistent. This study evaluated referral patterns, testing completion, and barriers among eligible patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss across a multi-center system. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 102 CRC patients with MLH1/PMS2 loss between January 2022 and December 2024. After excluding patients with BRAF mutation or MLH1 hypermethylation, 64 were eligible. Demographics, immunohistochemical findings, referral/testing outcomes, and documented barriers were collected. Chi-square tests assessed differences in referral and counseling completion by site of care. Results: Among the 64 eligible patients, mean age was 70; 55% were women. The cohort included 53% White, 37.7% African American, and 9.3% Asian patients. A history of other cancers was documented in 25%, with breast cancer in 33% of those. A total of 23 patients (35.9%) were seen at a university hospital and 41 (64.1%) at community hospitals. MLH1 loss was seen in 69% and PMS2 loss in 71.8%. Only 24 patients (37.5%) were referred to genetic counseling—10 of 23 (43.5%) at the university site and 14 of 41 (34.1%) at community sites. Of those referred, 13 (54.2%) completed germline testing—6 at the university and 7 at community sites—representing 20.3% of all eligible patients. Referral rates did not differ significantly between sites (χ² = 0.026, P = 0.871), nor did completion rates (χ² = 0.725, P = 0.394). The most common barrier was lack of provider initiation (63%). Patient-related barriers, including language, transportation, and relocation, were noted in 23%. Conclusion: Despite eligibility, fewer than 40% were referred, and only one in 5 completed testing. Referral and testing rates were slightly higher at the university site but remained suboptimal. Lack of provider referral was the main barrier, though social determinants contributed. These findings highlight the need for systems-based solutions—automated referrals, provider education, and navigation support—to improve LS evaluation and reduce disparities in access to genetic services.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.