S251 Contemporary Trends in the Management of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Changing Times?

Introduction: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is often associated with prolonged hospitalization and high mortality rates. The contemporary treatment paradigm has shifted away from open necrosectomies and towards step-up strategies that incorporate minimally invasive (MIS) approaches. However, it is unclear if this has translated to actual practice changes in the real world. This study aims to assess real-world practice patterns in the management of ANP. Methods: The New York and Florida state databases were used to identify patients diagnosed with ANP between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized into treatment groups of an open necrosectomy-first approach or a step-up approach, defined as patients first undergoing an MIS procedure with either a percutaneous, endoscopic, or laparoscopic approach. Hierarchal regression models were used to adjust for measured confounding, with fixed effects assigned to patient-level variables and random effects assigned to hospital-level identifiers. Results: We identified 1,180 patients with ANP; 104 (8.8%) underwent an open necrosectomy-first approach, whereas 1,076 (91.2%) underwent a step-up approach. Amongst those who underwent a step-up approach, only 18 patients (1.7%) eventually required an open necrosectomy after the initial MIS procedures. The proportion of patients who underwent an open necrosectomy-first approach steadily declined from 15.9% in 2016 to 6.3% in 2021, while the use of a step-up approach increased from 84.1% in 2016 to 93.7% in 2021 (P < 0.05. The median 1-year cumulative hospital charge was higher in the open necrosectomy-first group compared to the step-up group ($449,791 vs $338,679, P < 0.01). Patients in the open necrosectomy-first group had a longer median index hospital length of stay compared to the step-up group (24.0 days vs 15.0 days, P = 0.0006). Patients in the open necrosectomy-first group were also associated with a higher mortality rate compared to the step-up group (18.3% vs 10.2%, P = 0.01). Both findings were consistent on regression models adjusting for confounders. Conclusion: While a step-up approach for ANP is increasingly utilized, almost 10% of patients still undergo upfront open necrosectomy in contemporary years. Patients with ANP who undergo upfront necrosectomy were associated with longer hospital length of stay and higher mortality rates.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128464.79940.4a
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S251 Contemporary Trends in the Management of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Changing Times?

Po Hong Tan, James A. Madura, Stephanie Yu, Nabil Wasif et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

S251 Contemporary Trends in the Management of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis: Changing Times?

Po Hong Tan, James A. Madura, Stephanie Yu, Nabil Wasif, Rahul Pannala, Hoe Yan Hor, Zhi Ven Fong, Yu-Hui H. Chang, Dae Young Cheung, Max Miller, Melody Pi Yin Tu, Pei‐Wen Lim, Arshia Pessaran
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis (ANP) is often associated with prolonged hospitalization and high mortality rates. The contemporary treatment paradigm has shifted away from open necrosectomies and towards step-up strategies that incorporate minimally invasive (MIS) approaches. However, it is unclear if this has translated to actual practice changes in the real world. This study aims to assess real-world practice patterns in the management of ANP. Methods: The New York and Florida state databases were used to identify patients diagnosed with ANP between 2016 and 2021. Patients were categorized into treatment groups of an open necrosectomy-first approach or a step-up approach, defined as patients first undergoing an MIS procedure with either a percutaneous, endoscopic, or laparoscopic approach. Hierarchal regression models were used to adjust for measured confounding, with fixed effects assigned to patient-level variables and random effects assigned to hospital-level identifiers. Results: We identified 1,180 patients with ANP; 104 (8.8%) underwent an open necrosectomy-first approach, whereas 1,076 (91.2%) underwent a step-up approach. Amongst those who underwent a step-up approach, only 18 patients (1.7%) eventually required an open necrosectomy after the initial MIS procedures. The proportion of patients who underwent an open necrosectomy-first approach steadily declined from 15.9% in 2016 to 6.3% in 2021, while the use of a step-up approach increased from 84.1% in 2016 to 93.7% in 2021 (P < 0.05. The median 1-year cumulative hospital charge was higher in the open necrosectomy-first group compared to the step-up group ($449,791 vs $338,679, P < 0.01). Patients in the open necrosectomy-first group had a longer median index hospital length of stay compared to the step-up group (24.0 days vs 15.0 days, P = 0.0006). Patients in the open necrosectomy-first group were also associated with a higher mortality rate compared to the step-up group (18.3% vs 10.2%, P = 0.01). Both findings were consistent on regression models adjusting for confounders. Conclusion: While a step-up approach for ANP is increasingly utilized, almost 10% of patients still undergo upfront open necrosectomy in contemporary years. Patients with ANP who undergo upfront necrosectomy were associated with longer hospital length of stay and higher mortality rates.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.