Rural digital social innovation for health and social care: A systematic review

Digitalization in the health sector has created numerous opportunities for social innovators and change-makers. However, there is a lack of integrated knowledge of how the latest technological changes have impacted social innovators from marginalized populations living in rural contexts who are often considered the “left-behind” segment in the age of digitalization. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence for rural digital social innovations for health and social care. Drawing on searches from multiple databases we adopted a Context-Process-Outcomes Model to evaluate 25 empirical studies focused on innovations within the healthcare sector (18 studies) and general community level innovations (7 studies). Geographical distance between providers and rural patients was often the context for healthcare innovations, necessitating processes with multiple levels of collaboration, whereas diverse community-specific challenges were usually addressed through grassroots initiatives. Most healthcare and community level innovations had evidence of positive outcomes (e.g., positive impacts on health service utilization or community health). Although digitalization accelerated the scope and reach of social innovations, substantial human investment and rural community engagement remained crucial for success. In conclusion, our application of the Context-Process-Outcomes framework enabled us to aggregate diverse findings and unpack the role of digitalization in rural social innovations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SSM - Health Systems
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmhs.2025.100143
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rural digital social innovation for health and social care: A systematic review

Eric Ping Hung Li, Robert Janke, Kathy Lynn Rush, Vida Nyagre Yakong et al.
SSM - Health Systems
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Rural digital social innovation for health and social care: A systematic review

Eric Ping Hung Li, Robert Janke, Kathy Lynn Rush, Vida Nyagre Yakong, Cherisse Lynn Seaton, Rajeev Manhas, Khalad Hasan, Trina Kushnerik, Puneet Aulakh, Mike Zajko
article en

Abstract

Digitalization in the health sector has created numerous opportunities for social innovators and change-makers. However, there is a lack of integrated knowledge of how the latest technological changes have impacted social innovators from marginalized populations living in rural contexts who are often considered the “left-behind” segment in the age of digitalization. The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize evidence for rural digital social innovations for health and social care. Drawing on searches from multiple databases we adopted a Context-Process-Outcomes Model to evaluate 25 empirical studies focused on innovations within the healthcare sector (18 studies) and general community level innovations (7 studies). Geographical distance between providers and rural patients was often the context for healthcare innovations, necessitating processes with multiple levels of collaboration, whereas diverse community-specific challenges were usually addressed through grassroots initiatives. Most healthcare and community level innovations had evidence of positive outcomes (e.g., positive impacts on health service utilization or community health). Although digitalization accelerated the scope and reach of social innovations, substantial human investment and rural community engagement remained crucial for success. In conclusion, our application of the Context-Process-Outcomes framework enabled us to aggregate diverse findings and unpack the role of digitalization in rural social innovations.

SSM - Health SystemsVol. 5
Okanagan College (CA), British Library (GB), Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (IN), Okanagan University College (CA), University for Development Studies (GH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.