S341 Retrospective Analysis of Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Adenomatous Polyposes

Introduction: Adenomatous polyposis greatly increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and presents with different genetic etiologies and clinical characteristics. Some polyposis syndromes are inherited, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or its milder variant attenuated FAP (aFAP), with a pathogenic variation in the APC gene, and MUTYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP) with a biallelic mutation in the MUTYH gene. Others develop polyposis without a detectable germline mutation as colonic polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE). Current guidelines recommend intensive screening for individuals with colonic polyposis. While FAP patients are at increased risk for extraintestinal cancers, such as thyroid cancer, while MAP and CPUE patients are not. This single-center retrospective study aims to compare the clinical presentations of CPUE, FAP, aFAP, and MAP to guide management for effective CRC prevention. Methods: We identified 278 patients from a research registry at an academic tertiary care center between 1973 and 2025. Demographic data, genetic testing, and endoscopic findings were collected from retrospective chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to compare individuals across the groups. Significance was determined with Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, Chi square test. Results: One hundred forty (50.4%) of 278 patients were men. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 49.62 (27.85) years and significantly higher in the CPUE group (P < 0.001). White individuals were overrepresented across all groups (82.37%). Comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease were more likely in CPUE. Two hundred thirteen (76.6%) patients had genetic testing done out of which 126 (59.1%) had at least 1 pathogenic variation. The median and range for genes tested were 4 (1–46) for CPUE, 1 (1–36) for FAP, 2 (1-28) for aFAP, and 2 (1–69) for MAP. FAP had the highest median adenoma count (37) and percentage of gastric (65%) and small bowel polyps (46.3%) whereas CPUE had the lowest measures (16, 16.3%, and 2.9%). Conclusion: This analysis identified that despite similar colorectal phenotype, CPUE patients were older with a higher burden of comorbidities, than individuals with genetic polyposes. Endoscopic findings were variable, with FAP having the highest upper gastrointestinal involvement and CPUE having the least. These finding suggest that on top of being a risk factor for CRC, metabolic syndrome may be a risk factor for colonic polyposis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128824.38433.2e
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S341 Retrospective Analysis of Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Adenomatous Polyposes

Zachariah H. Foda, Keerti Boyapati, A. Stathopoulos, Vatsal Makhija
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

S341 Retrospective Analysis of Demographics and Clinical Characteristics of Adenomatous Polyposes

Zachariah H. Foda, Keerti Boyapati, A. Stathopoulos, Vatsal Makhija
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Adenomatous polyposis greatly increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) and presents with different genetic etiologies and clinical characteristics. Some polyposis syndromes are inherited, such as familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or its milder variant attenuated FAP (aFAP), with a pathogenic variation in the APC gene, and MUTYH-Associated Polyposis (MAP) with a biallelic mutation in the MUTYH gene. Others develop polyposis without a detectable germline mutation as colonic polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE). Current guidelines recommend intensive screening for individuals with colonic polyposis. While FAP patients are at increased risk for extraintestinal cancers, such as thyroid cancer, while MAP and CPUE patients are not. This single-center retrospective study aims to compare the clinical presentations of CPUE, FAP, aFAP, and MAP to guide management for effective CRC prevention. Methods: We identified 278 patients from a research registry at an academic tertiary care center between 1973 and 2025. Demographic data, genetic testing, and endoscopic findings were collected from retrospective chart review. Descriptive statistics were used to compare individuals across the groups. Significance was determined with Fisher's exact test, ANOVA, Chi square test. Results: One hundred forty (50.4%) of 278 patients were men. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) age was 49.62 (27.85) years and significantly higher in the CPUE group (P < 0.001). White individuals were overrepresented across all groups (82.37%). Comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease were more likely in CPUE. Two hundred thirteen (76.6%) patients had genetic testing done out of which 126 (59.1%) had at least 1 pathogenic variation. The median and range for genes tested were 4 (1–46) for CPUE, 1 (1–36) for FAP, 2 (1-28) for aFAP, and 2 (1–69) for MAP. FAP had the highest median adenoma count (37) and percentage of gastric (65%) and small bowel polyps (46.3%) whereas CPUE had the lowest measures (16, 16.3%, and 2.9%). Conclusion: This analysis identified that despite similar colorectal phenotype, CPUE patients were older with a higher burden of comorbidities, than individuals with genetic polyposes. Endoscopic findings were variable, with FAP having the highest upper gastrointestinal involvement and CPUE having the least. These finding suggest that on top of being a risk factor for CRC, metabolic syndrome may be a risk factor for colonic polyposis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.