Multi-objective daylight and energy-use optimization of the office building in climatic conditions of Ukraine

Paper investigates and proposes academically proven method for daylight and energy-use optimization of an office building (OB) in climatic conditions of Ukraine aiming to achieve optimal values of Daylight Factor (DF), Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) and minimal Energy Consumption (EC). The method employs parametric simulation modelling in Grasshopper software and includes: DF and DGP image-based simulation, EC simulation. The optimization process is based on using evolutionary algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimizations (MOO). The analysis identifies optimal values of Window-to-Wall Ratios (WWR), window Length-to-Height Ratios (LHR) and shading device depths for the south-facing facades of OB in Kyiv and Odesa, Ukraine, representing distinct climatic zones. The study demonstrates that proposed building façade optimization combined with the implementation of daylight control sensors can lead to 4-5% reduction in EC. Additionally, it was justified that façade design decisions should vary depending on two climatic zones of Ukraine. Furthermore, the correlation between higher WWR and higher DF & DGP was noticed. The following common trends were observed for both locations for optimal design variables: WWR is in 55 - 65% range; LHR ratio is approximately 2:1; shading device depth is 0.5-1 m. As for the differences between optimization of OB façade design for Kyiv and Odesa, informed by optimal values of DF, DGP and minimal EC, Odesa requires smaller WWR and larger solar shading than Kyiv. It is explained by milder climatic conditions of Odesa – higher winter temperatures and higher solar radiation. Optimal WWR ratios in Odessa are 5-10% smaller than in Kyiv, while at the same time optimal shading device depth is 10-20% deeper than in Kyiv.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy efficiency first.
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eef.2025.100007
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-objective daylight and energy-use optimization of the office building in climatic conditions of Ukraine

Keiichiro Taniguchi, Bogdan Kutsevych
Energy efficiency first.
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Multi-objective daylight and energy-use optimization of the office building in climatic conditions of Ukraine

Keiichiro Taniguchi, Bogdan Kutsevych
article en

Abstract

Paper investigates and proposes academically proven method for daylight and energy-use optimization of an office building (OB) in climatic conditions of Ukraine aiming to achieve optimal values of Daylight Factor (DF), Daylight Glare Probability (DGP) and minimal Energy Consumption (EC). The method employs parametric simulation modelling in Grasshopper software and includes: DF and DGP image-based simulation, EC simulation. The optimization process is based on using evolutionary algorithms for Multi-Objective Optimizations (MOO). The analysis identifies optimal values of Window-to-Wall Ratios (WWR), window Length-to-Height Ratios (LHR) and shading device depths for the south-facing facades of OB in Kyiv and Odesa, Ukraine, representing distinct climatic zones. The study demonstrates that proposed building façade optimization combined with the implementation of daylight control sensors can lead to 4-5% reduction in EC. Additionally, it was justified that façade design decisions should vary depending on two climatic zones of Ukraine. Furthermore, the correlation between higher WWR and higher DF & DGP was noticed. The following common trends were observed for both locations for optimal design variables: WWR is in 55 - 65% range; LHR ratio is approximately 2:1; shading device depth is 0.5-1 m. As for the differences between optimization of OB façade design for Kyiv and Odesa, informed by optimal values of DF, DGP and minimal EC, Odesa requires smaller WWR and larger solar shading than Kyiv. It is explained by milder climatic conditions of Odesa – higher winter temperatures and higher solar radiation. Optimal WWR ratios in Odessa are 5-10% smaller than in Kyiv, while at the same time optimal shading device depth is 10-20% deeper than in Kyiv.

Energy efficiency first.Vol. 2
National Academy of Fine Art and Architecture (UA), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.