S319 Real-Time Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review

Introduction: By offering real-time computer-aided detection systems that alert the endoscopist to suspicious lesions, artificial intelligence (AI) is being utilized increasingly frequently during colonoscopy to improve the detection of polyps. Numerous large randomized controlled trials show that AI-assisted colonoscopy decreases miss rates without increasing procedure duration and dramatically enhances adenoma and polyp detection rates. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of real-time AI on polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy. Methods: In May 2025, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating real-time AI use during colonoscopy. We included studies that compared AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard or non-AI colonoscopy and reported adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), or adenoma miss rate (AMR). Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data independently, resolving conflicts by consensus. Results: We screened 2,152 studies and included 119 that met our criteria, comprising 72 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 25 prospective studies, and 19 retrospective studies. All studies involved the real-time application of AI during colonoscopy and compared outcomes with standard or non-AI-assisted colonoscopy. The majority of studies evaluated CAD-EYE (66 studies), followed by custom AI models (35), GI Genius (10), and other systems including Endoangel and Endoaid. Across studies, 93 (78%) demonstrated statistically significant improvement in adenoma detection rate (ADR) with AI, while 18 studies (15%) showed no significant difference. An additional 4 studies reported improvement in polyp detection rate (PDR) without ADR benefit, and 4 studies focused on adenoma miss rate (AMR), all showing reductions in missed lesions with AI assistance. Reported ADRs ranged from 4.5% to 84.97% in AI-assisted groups versus 0.28% to 80% in control groups. Multiple tandem and multicenter trials confirmed that AI can enhance detection even among expert and high-performing endoscopists, with particularly notable gains in lower baseline detection settings. No study reported worse performance with AI. Conclusion: Across a range of systems, the use of real-time AI during colonoscopy continuously enhanced adenoma detection. These results provide credence to the use of AI to improve quality and lower miss rates. The long-term outcomes should be evaluated in future research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128736.95443.99
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S319 Real-Time Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review

Seth Richter, Osama Alshakhatreh, Ibrahim Mohammed, Mahima Gill et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

S319 Real-Time Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection: A Systematic Review

Seth Richter, Osama Alshakhatreh, Ibrahim Mohammed, Mahima Gill, Con Kelleher, Mohammed Mohammed, Shamayel Safdar, Yehya Maitah, Zarbakht Nisar
article en

Abstract

Introduction: By offering real-time computer-aided detection systems that alert the endoscopist to suspicious lesions, artificial intelligence (AI) is being utilized increasingly frequently during colonoscopy to improve the detection of polyps. Numerous large randomized controlled trials show that AI-assisted colonoscopy decreases miss rates without increasing procedure duration and dramatically enhances adenoma and polyp detection rates. Our study aimed to evaluate the impact of real-time AI on polyp and adenoma detection during colonoscopy. Methods: In May 2025, we searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies evaluating real-time AI use during colonoscopy. We included studies that compared AI-assisted colonoscopy with standard or non-AI colonoscopy and reported adenoma detection rate (ADR), polyp detection rate (PDR), or adenoma miss rate (AMR). Two reviewers screened studies and extracted data independently, resolving conflicts by consensus. Results: We screened 2,152 studies and included 119 that met our criteria, comprising 72 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 25 prospective studies, and 19 retrospective studies. All studies involved the real-time application of AI during colonoscopy and compared outcomes with standard or non-AI-assisted colonoscopy. The majority of studies evaluated CAD-EYE (66 studies), followed by custom AI models (35), GI Genius (10), and other systems including Endoangel and Endoaid. Across studies, 93 (78%) demonstrated statistically significant improvement in adenoma detection rate (ADR) with AI, while 18 studies (15%) showed no significant difference. An additional 4 studies reported improvement in polyp detection rate (PDR) without ADR benefit, and 4 studies focused on adenoma miss rate (AMR), all showing reductions in missed lesions with AI assistance. Reported ADRs ranged from 4.5% to 84.97% in AI-assisted groups versus 0.28% to 80% in control groups. Multiple tandem and multicenter trials confirmed that AI can enhance detection even among expert and high-performing endoscopists, with particularly notable gains in lower baseline detection settings. No study reported worse performance with AI. Conclusion: Across a range of systems, the use of real-time AI during colonoscopy continuously enhanced adenoma detection. These results provide credence to the use of AI to improve quality and lower miss rates. The long-term outcomes should be evaluated in future research.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.