Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≥70 with node-positive triple negative breast cancer

Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less frequently administered in patients >70 years with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to age-related comorbidity and fragility concerns.This study assesses trends and clinical benefit of NAC among clinically node-positive (cN+) patients. Methods:We identified females 70 in the National Cancer Database with cN+ nonmetastatic TNBC who underwent surgery from 2012-2021.Surgical approach, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, trends in NAC use, and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were used to assess the benefit of NAC. Results:Of 4,598 patients, 2377 (51.7%) received NAC, 1210 (26.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (AC), and 1101 (22.0%) received no chemotherapy.Rates of NAC increased from 29% to 75% (p<0.001).NAC was more common in younger patients with larger tumors and those treated at academic institutions (p<0.05).NAC patients were more likely to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (31%, AC: 18%, none: 15%, p<0.001).Among NAC patients, 22% had no response to NAC, 32% a breast pCR, 46% nodal a pCR and 25% pCR in both.7% of patients had breast pCR but remained pN+.Overall survival (OS) did not differ between NAC and AC patients but was better than those without chemotherapy (107.6 vs. 98.2 vs. 32.6 months, respectively).Achieving breast, axillary, or total pCR was associated with improved OS in NAC patients. Conclusion:While specific chemotherapy regimens, dose reductions, and adverse events were unable to be evaluated, clinically fit patients should be counseled on NAC as an option given the potential for clinical benefit J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Oncology Insight
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soi.2025.100196
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≥70 with node-positive triple negative breast cancer

Melissa McShane, Richard J. Bleicher, Brienne Donovan, Austin D. Williams et al.
Surgical Oncology Insight
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients ≥70 with node-positive triple negative breast cancer

Melissa McShane, Richard J. Bleicher, Brienne Donovan, Austin D. Williams, Craig L. Silverman, Anjali Chhugani
article en

Abstract

Background:Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is less frequently administered in patients >70 years with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) due to age-related comorbidity and fragility concerns.This study assesses trends and clinical benefit of NAC among clinically node-positive (cN+) patients. Methods:We identified females 70 in the National Cancer Database with cN+ nonmetastatic TNBC who underwent surgery from 2012-2021.Surgical approach, pathologic tumor and nodal stage, trends in NAC use, and rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were used to assess the benefit of NAC. Results:Of 4,598 patients, 2377 (51.7%) received NAC, 1210 (26.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy alone (AC), and 1101 (22.0%) received no chemotherapy.Rates of NAC increased from 29% to 75% (p<0.001).NAC was more common in younger patients with larger tumors and those treated at academic institutions (p<0.05).NAC patients were more likely to avoid axillary lymph node dissection (31%, AC: 18%, none: 15%, p<0.001).Among NAC patients, 22% had no response to NAC, 32% a breast pCR, 46% nodal a pCR and 25% pCR in both.7% of patients had breast pCR but remained pN+.Overall survival (OS) did not differ between NAC and AC patients but was better than those without chemotherapy (107.6 vs. 98.2 vs. 32.6 months, respectively).Achieving breast, axillary, or total pCR was associated with improved OS in NAC patients. Conclusion:While specific chemotherapy regimens, dose reductions, and adverse events were unable to be evaluated, clinically fit patients should be counseled on NAC as an option given the potential for clinical benefit J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f

Surgical Oncology InsightVol. 2(4)
Fox Chase Cancer Center (US), Temple University Hospital (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.