S313 Accelerated vs Standard Infliximab Induction in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Colectomy Outcomes

Introduction: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) often requires infliximab in patients unresponsive to steroids. While accelerated induction regimens aim to improve outcomes by overcoming rapid drug clearance, their benefit over standard induction remains uncertain. This meta-analysis compares colectomy outcomes between accelerated and standard infliximab induction in ASUC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of 4 electronic databases was conducted from inception to April 15, 2025 for the study comparing accelerated (defined as infliximab doses administered at weeks 0, 1, and 2 or similar intensified schedules) versus standard (0, 2, and 6 weeks) infliximab induction in ASUC patients. The outcomes assessed include overall and 3-month colectomy rates. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 8 studies involving 833 patients (294 in the accelerated group and 539 in the standard group) were included for analysis of overall colectomy. The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.54–1.94), indicating no statistically significant difference in overall colectomy rates between the 2 groups (P = 0.94). There was moderate heterogeneity across studies (I² = 60%), and the overall effect estimate was close to null. In the 3-month colectomy subgroup analysis (5 studies, 166 in the accelerated group vs 269 in the standard group), the pooled odds ratio was 1.69 (95% CI: 0.67–4.25), again showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.27). However, there was a trend toward reduced colectomy with accelerated induction. Heterogeneity remained moderate (I² = 59%). Individual study results varied, with 1 study (Liu 2024) reporting a notably high OR favoring accelerated induction (OR: 12.70), contributing to wider confidence intervals and increased variance. Conclusion: Accelerated infliximab induction did not significantly reduce overall or 3-month colectomy rates compared to standard induction in ASUC patients. While a trend toward benefit was seen at 3 months, heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals limit definitive conclusions. Further high-quality studies are warranted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001128712.86779.7c
Primary Topic
Microscopic Colitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S313 Accelerated vs Standard Infliximab Induction in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Colectomy Outcomes

Rukshar Thapa, Pragyat Singh, Momena Rashid, Venkateswarlu Chintagumpala et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Microscopic Colitis
article

S313 Accelerated vs Standard Infliximab Induction in Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Colectomy Outcomes

Rukshar Thapa, Pragyat Singh, Momena Rashid, Venkateswarlu Chintagumpala, Anurag Jha, Munna William, Nirmal Paudel
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) often requires infliximab in patients unresponsive to steroids. While accelerated induction regimens aim to improve outcomes by overcoming rapid drug clearance, their benefit over standard induction remains uncertain. This meta-analysis compares colectomy outcomes between accelerated and standard infliximab induction in ASUC. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of 4 electronic databases was conducted from inception to April 15, 2025 for the study comparing accelerated (defined as infliximab doses administered at weeks 0, 1, and 2 or similar intensified schedules) versus standard (0, 2, and 6 weeks) infliximab induction in ASUC patients. The outcomes assessed include overall and 3-month colectomy rates. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: A total of 8 studies involving 833 patients (294 in the accelerated group and 539 in the standard group) were included for analysis of overall colectomy. The pooled odds ratio was 1.03 (95% CI: 0.54–1.94), indicating no statistically significant difference in overall colectomy rates between the 2 groups (P = 0.94). There was moderate heterogeneity across studies (I² = 60%), and the overall effect estimate was close to null. In the 3-month colectomy subgroup analysis (5 studies, 166 in the accelerated group vs 269 in the standard group), the pooled odds ratio was 1.69 (95% CI: 0.67–4.25), again showing no statistically significant difference (P = 0.27). However, there was a trend toward reduced colectomy with accelerated induction. Heterogeneity remained moderate (I² = 59%). Individual study results varied, with 1 study (Liu 2024) reporting a notably high OR favoring accelerated induction (OR: 12.70), contributing to wider confidence intervals and increased variance. Conclusion: Accelerated infliximab induction did not significantly reduce overall or 3-month colectomy rates compared to standard induction in ASUC patients. While a trend toward benefit was seen at 3 months, heterogeneity and wide confidence intervals limit definitive conclusions. Further high-quality studies are warranted.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Microscopic Colitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.