S418 Meta-Analysis of Robotic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Lesions

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions can be technically challenging with a significant risk of adverse events. Few studies have shown improved outcomes with robotic ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the data. Methods: Online databases were searched for studies evaluating robotic ESD in patients with colorectal lesions. The outcomes of interest were technical success, en bloc resection, perioperative mortality, post ESD bleeding, and perforation. Pooled proportions were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 3 studies with 86 patients were included. The mean age was 63 years and 63% of patients were men. The average procedure duration was 74 minutes, speed of dissection was 45 mm2/min, specimen size was 38.7 mm and duration of hospital stay was 1 day. The pooled clinical outcomes were: technical success 95.4% (95% CI 82.95 to 99.99), en bloc resection 96.7% (95% CI 88.69 to 99.95), post ESD bleeding 3.4% (95% CI 0.68 to 8.22), and perforation 2.0% (95% CI 0.15 to 6.00). No cases of perioperative mortality were reported. Conclusion: Robotic ESD for colorectal lesions showed a high en bloc resection rate with low risk of adverse events.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129132.95310.37
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S418 Meta-Analysis of Robotic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Lesions

Sahib Singh, Sumant Inamdar, Babu P. Mohan, Parth Patel et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

S418 Meta-Analysis of Robotic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Lesions

Sahib Singh, Sumant Inamdar, Babu P. Mohan, Parth Patel, Dushyant Singh Dahiya, Ganesh Aswath, Vishnu Charan Suresh Kumar, Douglas G. Adler
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of colorectal lesions can be technically challenging with a significant risk of adverse events. Few studies have shown improved outcomes with robotic ESD. We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the data. Methods: Online databases were searched for studies evaluating robotic ESD in patients with colorectal lesions. The outcomes of interest were technical success, en bloc resection, perioperative mortality, post ESD bleeding, and perforation. Pooled proportions were calculated along with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: A total of 3 studies with 86 patients were included. The mean age was 63 years and 63% of patients were men. The average procedure duration was 74 minutes, speed of dissection was 45 mm2/min, specimen size was 38.7 mm and duration of hospital stay was 1 day. The pooled clinical outcomes were: technical success 95.4% (95% CI 82.95 to 99.99), en bloc resection 96.7% (95% CI 88.69 to 99.95), post ESD bleeding 3.4% (95% CI 0.68 to 8.22), and perforation 2.0% (95% CI 0.15 to 6.00). No cases of perioperative mortality were reported. Conclusion: Robotic ESD for colorectal lesions showed a high en bloc resection rate with low risk of adverse events.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S418 Meta-Analysis of Robotic Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Lesions — Sahib Singh, Sumant Inamdar, et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS