S455 High-Definition Dye Chromoendoscopy Boosts Dysplasia Detection by 75% Compared With White-Light Surveillance—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: High-definition (HD) dye-based chromoendoscopy (CE) is recommended for dysplasia surveillance in colonic IBD, yet many centers have reverted to HD white-light endoscopy (WLE) on the assumption that visual gains have disappeared. We analyzed the 4 most up-to-date randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HD-CE with HD-WLE—including the multicenter HELIOS 2025 RCT—to provide a data-driven answer. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified RCTs that compares white light versus chromoendoscopy or conventional for colonoscopy through May 2025. Data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.1. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (Higgins’ I²). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Results: Dysplasia occurred in 79/512 CE examinations versus 48/542 WLE examinations. Fixed-effect pooling yielded a 43% relative reduction in miss-rate with WLE (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41–0.80; I² 22%), equating to ∼1 extra dysplasia detected for every 18 patients screened. Advanced neoplasia was rare (9 vs 3 events); the trend favored CE but did not reach significance (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.17–1.82; I² 0%). Conclusion: This HD-exclusive meta-analysis confirms that dye augmentation remains clinically meaningful in 2025: CE nearly doubles dysplasia detection across diverse Asian and European cohorts with minimal heterogeneity, firmly validating SCENIC guidance. The low event count for advanced lesions limits power, yet the consistent directionality suggests CE may avert late-stage cancers with larger datasets or AI-assisted optics. Importantly, the benefit was realized without excess heterogeneity, indicating reproducibility in routine practice. These findings argue against abandoning dye spray and instead support streamlined CE or prolonged inspection times to safeguard patients with longstanding colitis. Our work provides the first modern benchmark for technology-enhanced surveillance and sets the stage for future trials integrating virtual chromoendoscopy and computer-aided detection—all with the goal of transforming dysplasia prevention into a reliably achievable standard of care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129280.04883.2f
Primary Topic
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S455 High-Definition Dye Chromoendoscopy Boosts Dysplasia Detection by 75% Compared With White-Light Surveillance—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Haroon Alamy, A. N. Das, Venkata Dileep Kumar Veldi
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
article

S455 High-Definition Dye Chromoendoscopy Boosts Dysplasia Detection by 75% Compared With White-Light Surveillance—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Haroon Alamy, A. N. Das, Venkata Dileep Kumar Veldi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: High-definition (HD) dye-based chromoendoscopy (CE) is recommended for dysplasia surveillance in colonic IBD, yet many centers have reverted to HD white-light endoscopy (WLE) on the assumption that visual gains have disappeared. We analyzed the 4 most up-to-date randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HD-CE with HD-WLE—including the multicenter HELIOS 2025 RCT—to provide a data-driven answer. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library identified RCTs that compares white light versus chromoendoscopy or conventional for colonoscopy through May 2025. Data were analyzed using RevMan 4.2.1. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Mantel-Haenszel methods. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on heterogeneity (Higgins’ I²). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0. Results: Dysplasia occurred in 79/512 CE examinations versus 48/542 WLE examinations. Fixed-effect pooling yielded a 43% relative reduction in miss-rate with WLE (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41–0.80; I² 22%), equating to ∼1 extra dysplasia detected for every 18 patients screened. Advanced neoplasia was rare (9 vs 3 events); the trend favored CE but did not reach significance (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.17–1.82; I² 0%). Conclusion: This HD-exclusive meta-analysis confirms that dye augmentation remains clinically meaningful in 2025: CE nearly doubles dysplasia detection across diverse Asian and European cohorts with minimal heterogeneity, firmly validating SCENIC guidance. The low event count for advanced lesions limits power, yet the consistent directionality suggests CE may avert late-stage cancers with larger datasets or AI-assisted optics. Importantly, the benefit was realized without excess heterogeneity, indicating reproducibility in routine practice. These findings argue against abandoning dye spray and instead support streamlined CE or prolonged inspection times to safeguard patients with longstanding colitis. Our work provides the first modern benchmark for technology-enhanced surveillance and sets the stage for future trials integrating virtual chromoendoscopy and computer-aided detection—all with the goal of transforming dysplasia prevention into a reliably achievable standard of care.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.