S3662 When Your Colleague Asks for Help: The EUROPE-FC Approach to ERCP Failure

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure occurs in 5-15% of cases. There are no guidelines in the medical literature to assist a colleague after procedural failures. In this case report, we describe a collaborative approach to manage ERCP failure. Case Description/Methods: Patient is a 29-year-old woman with right upper quadrant pain, nausea and vomiting. AST 72, ALT 134, bilirubin 0.7. Ultrasound: cholelithiasis, biliary dilation at 9 mm and choledocholithiases. During ERCP by a colleague, the ampulla was edematous. Pancreatic duct was inadvertently cannulated, and a 5 Fr 4 cm stent was placed in the ventral pancreatic duct. Precut sphincterotomy was performed, but biliary cannulation was not achieved. Sphincterotomy site bled, treated by epinephrine injection. The colleague asked us to help with management of ERCP failure. Empathy was verbalized. Technical difficulties (ampullary edema, atypical orientation of the bile duct), risks of pancreatitis (young age, female gender, normal bilirubin, multiple cannulation attempts) and bleeding were discussed and understood. Respect for our colleague was expressed. An ERCP re-attempt was offered. A plan was formed to minimize the risks of pancreatitis (IVF, indomethacin suppository), bleeding (intravenous pantoprazole, avoidance of the precut sphincterotomy) and ampullary edema (intravenous methylprednisolone). Execution succeeded with biliary cannulation, biliary sphincterotomy, balloon extraction of 2 biliary stones and 7 Fr 7 cm biliary stenting. Feedback was provided to the colleague. Communications were provided to patient, colleague, and team members. Patient did well. Two weeks later, she underwent ERCP by the colleague for removal of the stents. Discussion: Professional collaboration is important in our complex medical environment. We developed these steps when a colleague asks for help: Empathy: Verbalize awareness of the situation and show sensitivity toward colleague. Understanding: Recognize the indications, technical challenges and risks of complications. Respect: Appreciate and value the clinical judgement, humility and commitment to patient care of colleague. Offer: Accept to intervene or provide alternative solutions. Plan: Strategize to minimize risks and maximize efficacy. Execution: Implement plan. Feedback: Provide input to colleague for mutual growth. Communications: Discuss all steps transparently with patient, colleague and team members. The EUROPE-FC approach can be applied to all procedures and other clinical situations to optimize patient care and foster a collaborative work culture.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001142108.17506.e6
Primary Topic
Public Procurement and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S3662 When Your Colleague Asks for Help: The EUROPE-FC Approach to ERCP Failure

Thomas Tran, Zuhair Alam, Karthik Ragunathan, Christopher W. Good et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Public Procurement and Policy
article

S3662 When Your Colleague Asks for Help: The EUROPE-FC Approach to ERCP Failure

Thomas Tran, Zuhair Alam, Karthik Ragunathan, Christopher W. Good, Maninder Dhaliwal, Jenny Tran
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) failure occurs in 5-15% of cases. There are no guidelines in the medical literature to assist a colleague after procedural failures. In this case report, we describe a collaborative approach to manage ERCP failure. Case Description/Methods: Patient is a 29-year-old woman with right upper quadrant pain, nausea and vomiting. AST 72, ALT 134, bilirubin 0.7. Ultrasound: cholelithiasis, biliary dilation at 9 mm and choledocholithiases. During ERCP by a colleague, the ampulla was edematous. Pancreatic duct was inadvertently cannulated, and a 5 Fr 4 cm stent was placed in the ventral pancreatic duct. Precut sphincterotomy was performed, but biliary cannulation was not achieved. Sphincterotomy site bled, treated by epinephrine injection. The colleague asked us to help with management of ERCP failure. Empathy was verbalized. Technical difficulties (ampullary edema, atypical orientation of the bile duct), risks of pancreatitis (young age, female gender, normal bilirubin, multiple cannulation attempts) and bleeding were discussed and understood. Respect for our colleague was expressed. An ERCP re-attempt was offered. A plan was formed to minimize the risks of pancreatitis (IVF, indomethacin suppository), bleeding (intravenous pantoprazole, avoidance of the precut sphincterotomy) and ampullary edema (intravenous methylprednisolone). Execution succeeded with biliary cannulation, biliary sphincterotomy, balloon extraction of 2 biliary stones and 7 Fr 7 cm biliary stenting. Feedback was provided to the colleague. Communications were provided to patient, colleague, and team members. Patient did well. Two weeks later, she underwent ERCP by the colleague for removal of the stents. Discussion: Professional collaboration is important in our complex medical environment. We developed these steps when a colleague asks for help: Empathy: Verbalize awareness of the situation and show sensitivity toward colleague. Understanding: Recognize the indications, technical challenges and risks of complications. Respect: Appreciate and value the clinical judgement, humility and commitment to patient care of colleague. Offer: Accept to intervene or provide alternative solutions. Plan: Strategize to minimize risks and maximize efficacy. Execution: Implement plan. Feedback: Provide input to colleague for mutual growth. Communications: Discuss all steps transparently with patient, colleague and team members. The EUROPE-FC approach can be applied to all procedures and other clinical situations to optimize patient care and foster a collaborative work culture.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Public Procurement and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.