S519 BRAF Mutations Indicate Poor Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Among its subtypes, BRAF-mutated mCRC, particularly V600E, is associated with aggressive behavior and poor outcomes. Although anti-VEGF therapies are commonly used in mCRC, their role in the BRAF-mutated population remains uncertain. We aim to evaluate the survival outcomes of BRAF-mutated mCRC patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy compared to those with RAS mutations. Methods: We searched MEDLINE from inception to May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes in BRAF-mutated mCRC treated with anti-VEGF agents. Time-to-event data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves, and individual patient data were reconstructed using R. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Five RCTs were included. In the overall cohort, patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC (n = 171) had significantly worse OS compared to RAS-mutant patients (n = 936) [HR 2.11; 95% CI, 1.78–2.51; P < 0.0001], with a median OS of 10.1 vs 22.5 months. PFS was also inferior [HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19–1.87; P = 0.00037; median 5.0 vs 8.0 months]. After maintenance therapy, BRAF-mutant patients (n = 83) had significantly shorter OS [HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.40–2.27; P < 0.0001], while PFS was similar [HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47–1.07; P = 0.12]. For treatment-naive patients receiving initial therapy, BRAF-mutant patients (n = 47) again had significantly worse OS [HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39–2.65; P < 0.0001] and PFS [HR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30–3.00; P = 0.0012] compared to RAS-mutant patients (n = 403). In this subgroup, those treated with FOLFOXIRI (n = 14) had improved median OS (13.5 vs 10.9 months) and PFS (7.2 vs 6.8 months) compared to FOLFIRI (n = 33), though differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: BRAF-mutant mCRC is associated with significantly worse survival compared to RAS-mutant disease across all treatment phases. These findings emphasize the need for early molecular profiling, consideration of intensified first-line regimens, and prompt initiation of BRAF-targeted strategies upon progression. Limitations include trial heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Modern BRAF-targeted therapies (e.g., encorafenib plus cetuximab) were not represented. Future studies should refine sequencing of triplet chemotherapy versus targeted agents, evaluate maintenance strategies, and explore subclass-specific responses (V600E vs non-V600E).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129536.61296.f9
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S519 BRAF Mutations Indicate Poor Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Syeda Kanza Kazmi, Muhammad Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Kabir
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

S519 BRAF Mutations Indicate Poor Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Reconstructed Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Syeda Kanza Kazmi, Muhammad Abdul Rehman, Aqsa Kabir
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Among its subtypes, BRAF-mutated mCRC, particularly V600E, is associated with aggressive behavior and poor outcomes. Although anti-VEGF therapies are commonly used in mCRC, their role in the BRAF-mutated population remains uncertain. We aim to evaluate the survival outcomes of BRAF-mutated mCRC patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy compared to those with RAS mutations. Methods: We searched MEDLINE from inception to May 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes in BRAF-mutated mCRC treated with anti-VEGF agents. Time-to-event data were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves, and individual patient data were reconstructed using R. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and median overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Five RCTs were included. In the overall cohort, patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC (n = 171) had significantly worse OS compared to RAS-mutant patients (n = 936) [HR 2.11; 95% CI, 1.78–2.51; P < 0.0001], with a median OS of 10.1 vs 22.5 months. PFS was also inferior [HR 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19–1.87; P = 0.00037; median 5.0 vs 8.0 months]. After maintenance therapy, BRAF-mutant patients (n = 83) had significantly shorter OS [HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.40–2.27; P < 0.0001], while PFS was similar [HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.47–1.07; P = 0.12]. For treatment-naive patients receiving initial therapy, BRAF-mutant patients (n = 47) again had significantly worse OS [HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.39–2.65; P < 0.0001] and PFS [HR 1.97; 95% CI, 1.30–3.00; P = 0.0012] compared to RAS-mutant patients (n = 403). In this subgroup, those treated with FOLFOXIRI (n = 14) had improved median OS (13.5 vs 10.9 months) and PFS (7.2 vs 6.8 months) compared to FOLFIRI (n = 33), though differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion: BRAF-mutant mCRC is associated with significantly worse survival compared to RAS-mutant disease across all treatment phases. These findings emphasize the need for early molecular profiling, consideration of intensified first-line regimens, and prompt initiation of BRAF-targeted strategies upon progression. Limitations include trial heterogeneity and small sample sizes. Modern BRAF-targeted therapies (e.g., encorafenib plus cetuximab) were not represented. Future studies should refine sequencing of triplet chemotherapy versus targeted agents, evaluate maintenance strategies, and explore subclass-specific responses (V600E vs non-V600E).

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.