S520 Updated Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy in Patients With Positive Fecal Screening Tests

Introduction: In August 2024, The American Journal of Gastroenterology released updated multisociety guidelines on colonoscopy quality indicators, including a 50% adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmark for FIT and mt-sDNA positive patients and a longer withdrawal time (≥8 minutes). This study evaluates baseline ADR at our institution and the findings that may contribute to false positive screening tests. Methods: We performed a retrospective review from August 2022 to August 2024 across 2 campuses, including patients aged ≥45 who had colonoscopy after positive FIT or mt-sDNA. Data included demographics, polyp characteristics, and hemorrhoid grading. Results: Among 378 patients (284 mt-sDNA, 94 FIT), demographics were similar; mean age was ∼63 years. Most were non-Hispanic (Cologuard: 90.5%, FIT: 80.9%). ADR met or exceeded the 50% benchmark for both groups, with significantly higher rates in FIT (81.9%) vs mt-sDNA (66.6%) (P = 0.0036). Tubular adenomas were the most common lesions in both cohorts. Large TAs (>1 cm) were more frequent in mt-sDNA (22.2% vs 20.2%), but not statistically significant (P = 0.6781). SSAs were more prevalent with mt-sDNA (23.9% vs 14.9%), trending toward significance (P = 0.0741). FIT had significantly more large TVAs (10.6% vs 3.9%; P = 0.0069). HPs <1 cm were more common in mt-sDNA (32.7% vs 25.5%) though not statistically significant (P = 0.2162). Cancer rates were similar (mt-sDNA: 3.5%; FIT: 5.3%; P = 0.487). False positives were more frequent with mt-sDNA (21.8% vs 18.1%), though not significant (P = 0.4524). Hemorrhoids were the most common alternate finding (grade ≥2: 30.7%; < grade 2: 38.7%). Conclusion: These findings support the new ADR benchmark for stool based colorectal cancer screening tests. While mt-sDNA detects a broader lesion range, FIT shows superior ADR and TVA detection. mt-sDNA’s broader sensitivity may reduce specificity due to benign findings like hemorrhoids and hyperplastic polyps.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129540.16635.14
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S520 Updated Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy in Patients With Positive Fecal Screening Tests

Hari Movva, Reema Patel, Shayan Ravanassa, Raakhi Menon et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S520 Updated Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy in Patients With Positive Fecal Screening Tests

Hari Movva, Reema Patel, Shayan Ravanassa, Raakhi Menon, K S Sachdev
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In August 2024, The American Journal of Gastroenterology released updated multisociety guidelines on colonoscopy quality indicators, including a 50% adenoma detection rate (ADR) benchmark for FIT and mt-sDNA positive patients and a longer withdrawal time (≥8 minutes). This study evaluates baseline ADR at our institution and the findings that may contribute to false positive screening tests. Methods: We performed a retrospective review from August 2022 to August 2024 across 2 campuses, including patients aged ≥45 who had colonoscopy after positive FIT or mt-sDNA. Data included demographics, polyp characteristics, and hemorrhoid grading. Results: Among 378 patients (284 mt-sDNA, 94 FIT), demographics were similar; mean age was ∼63 years. Most were non-Hispanic (Cologuard: 90.5%, FIT: 80.9%). ADR met or exceeded the 50% benchmark for both groups, with significantly higher rates in FIT (81.9%) vs mt-sDNA (66.6%) (P = 0.0036). Tubular adenomas were the most common lesions in both cohorts. Large TAs (>1 cm) were more frequent in mt-sDNA (22.2% vs 20.2%), but not statistically significant (P = 0.6781). SSAs were more prevalent with mt-sDNA (23.9% vs 14.9%), trending toward significance (P = 0.0741). FIT had significantly more large TVAs (10.6% vs 3.9%; P = 0.0069). HPs <1 cm were more common in mt-sDNA (32.7% vs 25.5%) though not statistically significant (P = 0.2162). Cancer rates were similar (mt-sDNA: 3.5%; FIT: 5.3%; P = 0.487). False positives were more frequent with mt-sDNA (21.8% vs 18.1%), though not significant (P = 0.4524). Hemorrhoids were the most common alternate finding (grade ≥2: 30.7%; < grade 2: 38.7%). Conclusion: These findings support the new ADR benchmark for stool based colorectal cancer screening tests. While mt-sDNA detects a broader lesion range, FIT shows superior ADR and TVA detection. mt-sDNA’s broader sensitivity may reduce specificity due to benign findings like hemorrhoids and hyperplastic polyps.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S520 Updated Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy in Patients With Positive Fecal Screening Tests — Hari Movva, Reema Patel, et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS