S506 Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis Mortality in the United States Between 1999-2020

Introduction: Appendicitis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The aim of this study is to determine the trends and disparities in appendicitis mortality in American adults older than 25 years between 1999-2020. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database was conducted. Deaths attributed to appendicitis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (codes K35-K37. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude death rates (CDRs) per 100,000 persons were calculated. Joinpoint regression was used to determine average annual percentage change (AAPC). Mortality trends were analyzed by sex, race, geography, and age group. Results: A total of 8,453 deaths were reported. The overall AAMR was 0.17, with a significant decline from 0.21 in 1999 to 0.16 in 2020 (AAPC: -2.61; P < 0.001). Men had a higher AAMR (0.24) than women (0.13) and experienced a greater decline in mortality (AAPC: -2.60 vs -2.19; P < 0.001 for both). Among races, non-Hispanic (NH) American Indians/Alaskan Natives had the highest AAMR (0.28), followed by NH Black/African Americans (0.25), NH Whites (0.16), Hispanics/Latinos (0.14), and NH Asians (0.11). AAMRs declined across most racial groups, with the steepest decline among NH Blacks (AAPC: -3.81; P < 0.001), while NH Whites showed a slight, albeit non-significant increase (AAPC: 0.42; P= 0.77). Geographically, AAMR was highest in West (0.21), followed by Midwest (0.17), with the most notable regional decline observed in Midwest (AAPC: -3.05; P < 0.001). Nonmetropolitan areas had a higher AAMR (0.21) than metropolitan areas (0.17); however, metropolitan areas saw a greater decline (AAPC: -2.86 vs-1.55; P < 0.001 and P= 0.016, respectively). Among age groups, CDR was highest in those aged 85 years and older (1.7). While all age groups showed declining trends, the greatest reductions were observed in the 45-54 years (AAPC: -3.10; P < 0.001) and 65-74 years (AAPC: -3.08; P < 0.001) age groups. Conclusion: Appendicitis mortality in the U.S. significantly declined between 1999-2020; however, disparities remain. Males, NH American Indians, residents of West, and nonmetropolitan populations experienced disproportionately higher mortality rates. Notably, while all other demographic groups saw a decline in AAMR, NH Whites saw an increase, although not significant. These findings identify critical areas for public health interventions to mitigate mortality risks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129484.47008.ca
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S506 Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis Mortality in the United States Between 1999-2020

Wasim Ahmad, Rishi Chowdhary, Dhruv Gandhi, Samiksha Jain et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

S506 Trends and Disparities in Appendicitis Mortality in the United States Between 1999-2020

Wasim Ahmad, Rishi Chowdhary, Dhruv Gandhi, Samiksha Jain, Shamitha Hejmadi, Ayesha Cheema
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Appendicitis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The aim of this study is to determine the trends and disparities in appendicitis mortality in American adults older than 25 years between 1999-2020. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database was conducted. Deaths attributed to appendicitis were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (codes K35-K37. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) and crude death rates (CDRs) per 100,000 persons were calculated. Joinpoint regression was used to determine average annual percentage change (AAPC). Mortality trends were analyzed by sex, race, geography, and age group. Results: A total of 8,453 deaths were reported. The overall AAMR was 0.17, with a significant decline from 0.21 in 1999 to 0.16 in 2020 (AAPC: -2.61; P < 0.001). Men had a higher AAMR (0.24) than women (0.13) and experienced a greater decline in mortality (AAPC: -2.60 vs -2.19; P < 0.001 for both). Among races, non-Hispanic (NH) American Indians/Alaskan Natives had the highest AAMR (0.28), followed by NH Black/African Americans (0.25), NH Whites (0.16), Hispanics/Latinos (0.14), and NH Asians (0.11). AAMRs declined across most racial groups, with the steepest decline among NH Blacks (AAPC: -3.81; P < 0.001), while NH Whites showed a slight, albeit non-significant increase (AAPC: 0.42; P= 0.77). Geographically, AAMR was highest in West (0.21), followed by Midwest (0.17), with the most notable regional decline observed in Midwest (AAPC: -3.05; P < 0.001). Nonmetropolitan areas had a higher AAMR (0.21) than metropolitan areas (0.17); however, metropolitan areas saw a greater decline (AAPC: -2.86 vs-1.55; P < 0.001 and P= 0.016, respectively). Among age groups, CDR was highest in those aged 85 years and older (1.7). While all age groups showed declining trends, the greatest reductions were observed in the 45-54 years (AAPC: -3.10; P < 0.001) and 65-74 years (AAPC: -3.08; P < 0.001) age groups. Conclusion: Appendicitis mortality in the U.S. significantly declined between 1999-2020; however, disparities remain. Males, NH American Indians, residents of West, and nonmetropolitan populations experienced disproportionately higher mortality rates. Notably, while all other demographic groups saw a decline in AAMR, NH Whites saw an increase, although not significant. These findings identify critical areas for public health interventions to mitigate mortality risks.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.