S544 Effects of Centralized Management of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Results on Adherence to Follow-Up Colonoscopy

Introduction: Despite major advances in colorectal cancer prevention using colonoscopy, many people remain unscreened. Starting in 2019, a program of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) testing was initiated in the primary care medical clinic at our hospital, which serves a disadvantaged, inner-city population. Our initial experience demonstrated a high yield of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and cancers in FIT positive (FIT+) patients studied between 2019-2021. However, a minority of the FIT+ patients underwent colonoscopy. In this follow up study, we examined the effect of centralizing the follow up management and navigation of FIT+ patients, as compared to our historical control group. Methods: In 2022, the GI patient navigators were given the responsibility for following up FIT+ results, instead of primary care providers. We retrospectively compared patients with FIT+ results from January 2022 to February 2025 (post-centralizing group) to patients who tested FIT+ from July 2019 to December 2021 (pre-centralizing group). We analyzed completion of follow-up colonoscopy, reasons for nonadherence, and colonoscopy yield. Results: Three hundred eighty five FIT+ were identified between 2019-2025, with 174 patients in pre-centralizing group and 211 in post-centralizing group. Patients in post-centralizing group were younger (mean age, 63 vs 61 years old, P = 0.008), and more African American (30.5% vs 41.2%, P = 0.001). No significant difference was found in gender. More patients in the post-centralizing group were given a colonoscopy order (75.9% vs 84.8%, P = 0.026) and completed colonoscopy (46% vs 61.6%, P = 0.001), increasing adherence by 33.4%. The effect is more clearly observed in patients for ‘screening,’ who did not have lower GI symptoms or anemia, for whom adherence rose from 41.7% to 62.5% (P = 0.001), a 49.9% increase. Reasons for nonadherence were predominantly patient-related (61.7% vs 69.1%). No significant differences were found in the timeliness of follow-up procedure, or detection rates of advanced adenoma or cancer. Conclusion: Centralizing follow up and navigation improved adherence to colonoscopy in FIT+ patients by 33.4% overall, and 49.9% in patients without GI symptoms or anemia. However, 38.4% did not undergo colonoscopy, with patient refusal being the major reason. Further efforts to improve adherence through enhanced education of the implications of FIT+ are ongoing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129636.02524.73
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S544 Effects of Centralized Management of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Results on Adherence to Follow-Up Colonoscopy

Adejoke Johnson, Katherine Burke, Rahul Kumar, Martin McIntosh et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
article

S544 Effects of Centralized Management of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Results on Adherence to Follow-Up Colonoscopy

Adejoke Johnson, Katherine Burke, Rahul Kumar, Martin McIntosh, Changlin Gong, Donald P. Kotler, Joo Hee Park
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Despite major advances in colorectal cancer prevention using colonoscopy, many people remain unscreened. Starting in 2019, a program of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) testing was initiated in the primary care medical clinic at our hospital, which serves a disadvantaged, inner-city population. Our initial experience demonstrated a high yield of adenomas, advanced adenomas, and cancers in FIT positive (FIT+) patients studied between 2019-2021. However, a minority of the FIT+ patients underwent colonoscopy. In this follow up study, we examined the effect of centralizing the follow up management and navigation of FIT+ patients, as compared to our historical control group. Methods: In 2022, the GI patient navigators were given the responsibility for following up FIT+ results, instead of primary care providers. We retrospectively compared patients with FIT+ results from January 2022 to February 2025 (post-centralizing group) to patients who tested FIT+ from July 2019 to December 2021 (pre-centralizing group). We analyzed completion of follow-up colonoscopy, reasons for nonadherence, and colonoscopy yield. Results: Three hundred eighty five FIT+ were identified between 2019-2025, with 174 patients in pre-centralizing group and 211 in post-centralizing group. Patients in post-centralizing group were younger (mean age, 63 vs 61 years old, P = 0.008), and more African American (30.5% vs 41.2%, P = 0.001). No significant difference was found in gender. More patients in the post-centralizing group were given a colonoscopy order (75.9% vs 84.8%, P = 0.026) and completed colonoscopy (46% vs 61.6%, P = 0.001), increasing adherence by 33.4%. The effect is more clearly observed in patients for ‘screening,’ who did not have lower GI symptoms or anemia, for whom adherence rose from 41.7% to 62.5% (P = 0.001), a 49.9% increase. Reasons for nonadherence were predominantly patient-related (61.7% vs 69.1%). No significant differences were found in the timeliness of follow-up procedure, or detection rates of advanced adenoma or cancer. Conclusion: Centralizing follow up and navigation improved adherence to colonoscopy in FIT+ patients by 33.4% overall, and 49.9% in patients without GI symptoms or anemia. However, 38.4% did not undergo colonoscopy, with patient refusal being the major reason. Further efforts to improve adherence through enhanced education of the implications of FIT+ are ongoing.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.