S489 Predictors of Ostomy and Outcomes in Colonic Stenting for Obstructing Colon Cancer

Introduction: In colonic stenting, a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is introduced in the colon to alleviate the obstruction. However, in some cases, the need for ostomy may arise, impacting their survival. Patients with colon cancer are at risk of intestinal obstruction, which may necessitate such interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of ostomy among colonic stenting procedures in colon cancer patients, factors that contributed to such procedures, and their all-cause-in-hospital death rate. Methods: Adults with colon cancer and suffering from intestinal obstruction who were hospitalized for colonic stenting were studied through de-identified records compiled as the National Inpatient Sample. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to analyze various factors that could have influenced the need for ostomy creation. The mortality rate among those undergoing ostomy was also estimated. Results: We identified 3,555 cases of colon cancer who underwent colonic stenting between 2016 and 2021. The mean age of the sample was 65.0 years. Approximately 12.8% (455 cases) required ostomy procedures. Further analysis found that patients who were hospitalized on an elective basis, treated at urban teaching or non-teaching centers(vs rural), had suffered weight loss or were diagnosed with obesity, or had a history of chronic kidney disease, or liver cirrhosis, were more likely to undergo ostomy procedures. Meanwhile, women (vs men), patients with dementia, dyslipidemia, racially classified as Blacks (vs Whites), or with metastasis had lower odds of such procedures. No discrepancies were seen based on their insurance form and other comorbidities. The need for ostomy resulted in longer hospitalizations (mean stay of 15.52 days vs 7.35, P < 0.01), with higher hospital charges ($240,559 vs $90,496, P < 0.01). Around 11.0% (vs 3.2%) of ostomy patients did not survive, which affected an older group (mean age 71.20 vs 65.57 years, P < 0.01), with a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (5.80 vs 4.94, P= 0.017). Conclusion: Colon cancer patients undergoing colonic stenting for obstruction may require ostomy that can be influenced by the sex of the patients, the location of the hospital, and various comorbidities. Ostomy in older patients who are sicker may also lead to poorer outcomes. Therefore, physicians must conduct meticulous pre-operative screening and adopt thorough post-operative follow-ups during their stay.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129416.56926.52
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S489 Predictors of Ostomy and Outcomes in Colonic Stenting for Obstructing Colon Cancer

Wesam Frandah, Kinnari Pandya, Kamleshun Ramphul, Renuka Verma et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

S489 Predictors of Ostomy and Outcomes in Colonic Stenting for Obstructing Colon Cancer

Wesam Frandah, Kinnari Pandya, Kamleshun Ramphul, Renuka Verma, Ahmed Sherif, Tejas P. Joshi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: In colonic stenting, a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) is introduced in the colon to alleviate the obstruction. However, in some cases, the need for ostomy may arise, impacting their survival. Patients with colon cancer are at risk of intestinal obstruction, which may necessitate such interventions. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of ostomy among colonic stenting procedures in colon cancer patients, factors that contributed to such procedures, and their all-cause-in-hospital death rate. Methods: Adults with colon cancer and suffering from intestinal obstruction who were hospitalized for colonic stenting were studied through de-identified records compiled as the National Inpatient Sample. A multivariable logistic regression model was created to analyze various factors that could have influenced the need for ostomy creation. The mortality rate among those undergoing ostomy was also estimated. Results: We identified 3,555 cases of colon cancer who underwent colonic stenting between 2016 and 2021. The mean age of the sample was 65.0 years. Approximately 12.8% (455 cases) required ostomy procedures. Further analysis found that patients who were hospitalized on an elective basis, treated at urban teaching or non-teaching centers(vs rural), had suffered weight loss or were diagnosed with obesity, or had a history of chronic kidney disease, or liver cirrhosis, were more likely to undergo ostomy procedures. Meanwhile, women (vs men), patients with dementia, dyslipidemia, racially classified as Blacks (vs Whites), or with metastasis had lower odds of such procedures. No discrepancies were seen based on their insurance form and other comorbidities. The need for ostomy resulted in longer hospitalizations (mean stay of 15.52 days vs 7.35, P < 0.01), with higher hospital charges ($240,559 vs $90,496, P < 0.01). Around 11.0% (vs 3.2%) of ostomy patients did not survive, which affected an older group (mean age 71.20 vs 65.57 years, P < 0.01), with a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (5.80 vs 4.94, P= 0.017). Conclusion: Colon cancer patients undergoing colonic stenting for obstruction may require ostomy that can be influenced by the sex of the patients, the location of the hospital, and various comorbidities. Ostomy in older patients who are sicker may also lead to poorer outcomes. Therefore, physicians must conduct meticulous pre-operative screening and adopt thorough post-operative follow-ups during their stay.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.