S539 Assessing Endoscopist Performance Using Updated Colonoscopy Quality Benchmarks

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard in colon cancer screening and has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its associated mortality. A high-quality exam is essential in procedural efficacy and patient outcomes. An update in colonoscopy quality metrics was proposed in the Fall of 2024 to include a higher adenoma detection rate (>35%) and longer withdrawal time (>8 minutes). This study aims to evaluate how the endoscopists in our center perform against these new benchmarks. Methods: This is a single center retrospective review including 7,098 colonoscopies performed by 51 endoscopists in 1/2024-12/2024. Key metrics including cecal intubation rate (CIR), withdrawal time (WT), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were reported. Patients with inadequate preparation were excluded. The proportion of endoscopists meeting previous quality benchmarks was compared to those meeting updated thresholds. Results: All physicians achieved cecal intubation in ≥95% of their cases. For WT, 45/51 (88%) physicians had WT >6 minutes and 35/51 (69%) physicians had WT >8 minutes in ≥95% of their cases. When assessing WT in 100% of their cases, 32/51 (63%) had a WT >6 minutes and 17/51 (33%) had a WT >8 minutes. Regarding adenoma detection, 49/51 (96%) physicians had ADR ≥25% and 47/51 (92%) physicians had ADR ≥35%. Furthermore, 44/51 (86%) physicians had SSLDR ≥6%. Conclusion: Colonoscopy quality was excellent in this review, likely due to the existing quality monitoring and feedback program at our center. While a high proportion of our endoscopists met the new thresholds for ADR and SSLDR, adoption of a longer WT is an area for improvement. Notably our study period overlapped with the prior guidelines recommending >6 minute WT, which may account for the observed low adherence to >8 minute WT threshold. Adequate WT allows for close mucosal inspection and can contribute to higher ADR and SSLDR. Ongoing monitoring of these updated quality indicators is crucial for improving colonoscopy quality and ultimately enhancing CRC prevention.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129616.06363.b9
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S539 Assessing Endoscopist Performance Using Updated Colonoscopy Quality Benchmarks

Angela Worden, Francisco C. Ramirez, Carolyn Mead‐Harvey, Lisa Anderson et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S539 Assessing Endoscopist Performance Using Updated Colonoscopy Quality Benchmarks

Angela Worden, Francisco C. Ramirez, Carolyn Mead‐Harvey, Lisa Anderson, Suryakanth Gurudu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard in colon cancer screening and has been shown to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) and its associated mortality. A high-quality exam is essential in procedural efficacy and patient outcomes. An update in colonoscopy quality metrics was proposed in the Fall of 2024 to include a higher adenoma detection rate (>35%) and longer withdrawal time (>8 minutes). This study aims to evaluate how the endoscopists in our center perform against these new benchmarks. Methods: This is a single center retrospective review including 7,098 colonoscopies performed by 51 endoscopists in 1/2024-12/2024. Key metrics including cecal intubation rate (CIR), withdrawal time (WT), adenoma detection rate (ADR), and sessile serrated lesion detection rate (SSLDR) were reported. Patients with inadequate preparation were excluded. The proportion of endoscopists meeting previous quality benchmarks was compared to those meeting updated thresholds. Results: All physicians achieved cecal intubation in ≥95% of their cases. For WT, 45/51 (88%) physicians had WT >6 minutes and 35/51 (69%) physicians had WT >8 minutes in ≥95% of their cases. When assessing WT in 100% of their cases, 32/51 (63%) had a WT >6 minutes and 17/51 (33%) had a WT >8 minutes. Regarding adenoma detection, 49/51 (96%) physicians had ADR ≥25% and 47/51 (92%) physicians had ADR ≥35%. Furthermore, 44/51 (86%) physicians had SSLDR ≥6%. Conclusion: Colonoscopy quality was excellent in this review, likely due to the existing quality monitoring and feedback program at our center. While a high proportion of our endoscopists met the new thresholds for ADR and SSLDR, adoption of a longer WT is an area for improvement. Notably our study period overlapped with the prior guidelines recommending >6 minute WT, which may account for the observed low adherence to >8 minute WT threshold. Adequate WT allows for close mucosal inspection and can contribute to higher ADR and SSLDR. Ongoing monitoring of these updated quality indicators is crucial for improving colonoscopy quality and ultimately enhancing CRC prevention.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.