S469 Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Among Patients Diagnosed With Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have declined in the United States over the past 2 decades, largely due to advances in screening and surveillance. However, these improvements have not been equitably experienced across all populations. Disparities in CRC outcomes persist across age, race, ethnicity, and other sociodemographic characteristics. For instance, Black individuals are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages compared to white individuals, while data on CRC outcomes among other racial and ethnic groups remain limited. Understanding the barriers to timely CRC detection is critical for developing targeted interventions. This study aims to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with CRC diagnosis in a diverse urban population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of 308 patient records at a tertiary academic medical center. Data collected included demographics, clinical history, prior CRC screening, and diagnostic information. The primary outcome was stage at diagnosis, dichotomized into early stage (I–II) and late stage (III-IV). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using STATA (Windows). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in stage at diagnosis by age, sex assigned at birth, race, or ethnicity. Patients without a primary care provider (PCP) in the health system performing the colonoscopy were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage (odds ratio [OR] 2.11), as were those without CRC screening in the past 10 years (OR 2.20). In addition, diagnostic colonoscopy was strongly associated with late-stage diagnosis compared to colonoscopy performed for screening (OR 6.5). Conclusion: Our findings underscore the critical role of consistent primary care and timely CRC screening in promoting early detection. As could be expected, patients who were not up to date with CRC screening or who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease. What is notable is the difference in stage at diagnosis based on if the patient had a PCP in the health system performing the colonoscopy. This finding may reflect factors such as adherence to follow-up with a PCP prior to diagnosis or delays in time to colonoscopy after referral. While no significant differences were found by age, sex, race, or ethnicity, further studies involving larger cohorts are needed to assess whether these factors are associated with CRC stage at diagnosis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129336.32907.6a
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S469 Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Among Patients Diagnosed With Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital

Hetal Patel, Michael Fayad, Keith Naylor, Jessica E. McClain et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S469 Trends in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Among Patients Diagnosed With Colorectal Cancer in a Tertiary Hospital

Hetal Patel, Michael Fayad, Keith Naylor, Jessica E. McClain, Gabriela Mendez, Bharathi Chinnakotla
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have declined in the United States over the past 2 decades, largely due to advances in screening and surveillance. However, these improvements have not been equitably experienced across all populations. Disparities in CRC outcomes persist across age, race, ethnicity, and other sociodemographic characteristics. For instance, Black individuals are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages compared to white individuals, while data on CRC outcomes among other racial and ethnic groups remain limited. Understanding the barriers to timely CRC detection is critical for developing targeted interventions. This study aims to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with CRC diagnosis in a diverse urban population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional review of 308 patient records at a tertiary academic medical center. Data collected included demographics, clinical history, prior CRC screening, and diagnostic information. The primary outcome was stage at diagnosis, dichotomized into early stage (I–II) and late stage (III-IV). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed using STATA (Windows). Results: There were no statistically significant differences in stage at diagnosis by age, sex assigned at birth, race, or ethnicity. Patients without a primary care provider (PCP) in the health system performing the colonoscopy were more likely to be diagnosed at a late stage (odds ratio [OR] 2.11), as were those without CRC screening in the past 10 years (OR 2.20). In addition, diagnostic colonoscopy was strongly associated with late-stage diagnosis compared to colonoscopy performed for screening (OR 6.5). Conclusion: Our findings underscore the critical role of consistent primary care and timely CRC screening in promoting early detection. As could be expected, patients who were not up to date with CRC screening or who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy were more likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease. What is notable is the difference in stage at diagnosis based on if the patient had a PCP in the health system performing the colonoscopy. This finding may reflect factors such as adherence to follow-up with a PCP prior to diagnosis or delays in time to colonoscopy after referral. While no significant differences were found by age, sex, race, or ethnicity, further studies involving larger cohorts are needed to assess whether these factors are associated with CRC stage at diagnosis.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.