S471 Artificial Intelligence in Endoanal Ultrasound: A Multicentric Study on a Multilesion Model for Benign Anorectal Lesion Detection and Differentiation

Introduction: Endoanal Ultrasound (EAUS) is a key diagnostic tool for anorectal diseases, valued for its simplicity and tolerability. However, its interpretation is challenged by significant interobserver variability, a steep learning curve, and limited accessibility. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance EAUS remains in its early stages. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interoperable AI model capable of differentiating multiple benign anorectal lesions using EAUS. Methods: An EfficientNet-based AI model was developed using 4,722 EAUS frames, from 105 procedures performed across 3 centers using 2 different ultrasound devices. Two experts independently classified frames into 5 categories: external anal sphincter (EAS) laceration, internal anal sphincter (IAS) laceration, anal fissure (AF), intersphincteric fistula (ISF), and transsphincteric fistula (TSF). Frames with concordant classifications established the ground truth. The dataset was split into training/validation (90%, with 3-fold cross-validation) and test (10%) sets. The model with the best F1-score was tested Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. Results: Training/validation mean (±SD) accuracies were: EAS 0.85 (±0.03), IAS 0.85 (±0.003), AF 0.98 (±0.02), ISF 0.99 (±0.01), TSF 0.99 (±0.01). On the test set, respective accuracies were: EAS 0.88, IAS 0.88, AF 0.99, ISF 1.00, TSF 0.99. Conclusion: This pioneering AI model demonstrates high accuracy in differentiating 5 benign anorectal lesions using EAUS. As the first multilesion solution in this area, it represents a significant step toward standardizing EAUS interpretation and expanding access to expert-level diagnostic support. With further prospective validation, this technology has the potential to transform clinical workflows and improve decision-making in anorectal care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129344.47663.50
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S471 Artificial Intelligence in Endoanal Ultrasound: A Multicentric Study on a Multilesion Model for Benign Anorectal Lesion Detection and Differentiation

Jaime S. Cardoso, João L. Afonso, Bruno Mendes, Miguel A. Martins et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

S471 Artificial Intelligence in Endoanal Ultrasound: A Multicentric Study on a Multilesion Model for Benign Anorectal Lesion Detection and Differentiation

Jaime S. Cardoso, João L. Afonso, Bruno Mendes, Miguel A. Martins, Patrícia Andrade, Tiago Ribeiro, António Miguel Martins Pinto da Costa, Francisco Mendes, Guilherme Macedo, Joana Portugal Mota, Jorge Arias, Maria João Almeida, Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva, João Ferreira, Matheus Ferreira de Carvalho, Castro Poças, Pedro Diaz Denoso
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endoanal Ultrasound (EAUS) is a key diagnostic tool for anorectal diseases, valued for its simplicity and tolerability. However, its interpretation is challenged by significant interobserver variability, a steep learning curve, and limited accessibility. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance EAUS remains in its early stages. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an interoperable AI model capable of differentiating multiple benign anorectal lesions using EAUS. Methods: An EfficientNet-based AI model was developed using 4,722 EAUS frames, from 105 procedures performed across 3 centers using 2 different ultrasound devices. Two experts independently classified frames into 5 categories: external anal sphincter (EAS) laceration, internal anal sphincter (IAS) laceration, anal fissure (AF), intersphincteric fistula (ISF), and transsphincteric fistula (TSF). Frames with concordant classifications established the ground truth. The dataset was split into training/validation (90%, with 3-fold cross-validation) and test (10%) sets. The model with the best F1-score was tested Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1-score. Results: Training/validation mean (±SD) accuracies were: EAS 0.85 (±0.03), IAS 0.85 (±0.003), AF 0.98 (±0.02), ISF 0.99 (±0.01), TSF 0.99 (±0.01). On the test set, respective accuracies were: EAS 0.88, IAS 0.88, AF 0.99, ISF 1.00, TSF 0.99. Conclusion: This pioneering AI model demonstrates high accuracy in differentiating 5 benign anorectal lesions using EAUS. As the first multilesion solution in this area, it represents a significant step toward standardizing EAUS interpretation and expanding access to expert-level diagnostic support. With further prospective validation, this technology has the potential to transform clinical workflows and improve decision-making in anorectal care.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.