S494 Obesity and Sociodemographic Patterns in Early vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer Hospitalizations

Introduction: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, is rising despite a decline in overall colorectal cancer (CRC) rates. EOCRC presents unique clinical challenges and disparities, with emerging evidence linking obesity and sociodemographic factors to increased risk. The objective focus of this study was to compare hospitalization trends, length of stay, inpatient mortality, and sociodemographic disparities between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC), with particular focus on the role of obesity. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2020) for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CRC. Patients were classified as EOCRC (<50 years) or LOCRC (≥50 years). Multivariate logistic regression evaluated associations between body mass index (BMI), demographics, and inpatient outcomes including mortality, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient chemotherapy use. Results: A total of 246,231 inpatient hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) were identified. Of these, 33,662 (13.7%) were classified as EOCRC, while 212,569 (86.3%) were classified as LOCRC. EOCRC patients were more likely to be women (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, P < 0.001), Black (OR 1.17), Hispanic (OR 1.56), or Asian (OR 1.29) compared to White patients (P < 0.001 for all). They were also more likely to have Medicaid, private insurance, or be uninsured, while LOCRC patients were predominantly Medicare-insured. Obesity was significantly associated with EOCRC in patients with BMI 30–39 (OR 1.08, P= 0.008) and BMI ≥ 40 (OR 1.52, P < 0.001). Conversely, LOCRC showed that patients with a BMI 30-39 (OR 0.92, P= 0.008) and BMI ≥ 40 (OR 0.656, P < 0.001). EOCRC patients had higher rates of tobacco use disorder (OR 1.25), depression (OR 1.14), and lower rates of diabetes, CAD, and alcohol use disorder. EOCRC patients had slightly shorter LOS (6.01 vs 6.66 days) and lower inpatient mortality (OR 0.649, P < 0.001). Inpatient chemotherapy use was more likely in patients with EOCRC (OR 1.75, P < 0.001). Conclusion: EOCRC patients demonstrate distinct demographic, clinical, and inpatient profiles compared to LOCRC patients, with obesity, race, and insurance status playing key roles. The increased burden among younger, racially diverse, and uninsured populations underscores the need for early screening, risk stratification, and targeted prevention strategies. These findings reinforce changes in CRC screening guidelines and call for further research into the biological and social drivers of EOCRC.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129436.25921.77
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S494 Obesity and Sociodemographic Patterns in Early vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer Hospitalizations

Sharon Li, Lawanya Singh, Manali Shah, Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Diet and metabolism studies
article

S494 Obesity and Sociodemographic Patterns in Early vs Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer Hospitalizations

Sharon Li, Lawanya Singh, Manali Shah, Ravi Prakash Upadhyay
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, is rising despite a decline in overall colorectal cancer (CRC) rates. EOCRC presents unique clinical challenges and disparities, with emerging evidence linking obesity and sociodemographic factors to increased risk. The objective focus of this study was to compare hospitalization trends, length of stay, inpatient mortality, and sociodemographic disparities between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC), with particular focus on the role of obesity. Methods: We analyzed data from the National Inpatient Sample (2016–2020) for hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of CRC. Patients were classified as EOCRC (<50 years) or LOCRC (≥50 years). Multivariate logistic regression evaluated associations between body mass index (BMI), demographics, and inpatient outcomes including mortality, length of stay (LOS), and inpatient chemotherapy use. Results: A total of 246,231 inpatient hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) were identified. Of these, 33,662 (13.7%) were classified as EOCRC, while 212,569 (86.3%) were classified as LOCRC. EOCRC patients were more likely to be women (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, P < 0.001), Black (OR 1.17), Hispanic (OR 1.56), or Asian (OR 1.29) compared to White patients (P < 0.001 for all). They were also more likely to have Medicaid, private insurance, or be uninsured, while LOCRC patients were predominantly Medicare-insured. Obesity was significantly associated with EOCRC in patients with BMI 30–39 (OR 1.08, P= 0.008) and BMI ≥ 40 (OR 1.52, P < 0.001). Conversely, LOCRC showed that patients with a BMI 30-39 (OR 0.92, P= 0.008) and BMI ≥ 40 (OR 0.656, P < 0.001). EOCRC patients had higher rates of tobacco use disorder (OR 1.25), depression (OR 1.14), and lower rates of diabetes, CAD, and alcohol use disorder. EOCRC patients had slightly shorter LOS (6.01 vs 6.66 days) and lower inpatient mortality (OR 0.649, P < 0.001). Inpatient chemotherapy use was more likely in patients with EOCRC (OR 1.75, P < 0.001). Conclusion: EOCRC patients demonstrate distinct demographic, clinical, and inpatient profiles compared to LOCRC patients, with obesity, race, and insurance status playing key roles. The increased burden among younger, racially diverse, and uninsured populations underscores the need for early screening, risk stratification, and targeted prevention strategies. These findings reinforce changes in CRC screening guidelines and call for further research into the biological and social drivers of EOCRC.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.