S571 Accuracy of Visual Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Pathology in a Real-World Setting

Introduction: Predicting the histology of colon polyps during colonoscopy using real-time visual assessment has clinical relevance. Accurate characterization guides immediate clinical decisions, like the need for polypectomy, and reduces unnecessary procedures, risks and costs. Traditionally, polyps are classified by histopathology, but emerging tools, including artificial intelligence, offer real-time, non-invasive characterization. Experienced gastroenterologists can make accurate predictions without these tools. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of visual prediction of colon polyp pathology in a community based colonoscopy setting. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a community hospital with identified polyps over 2 months were included. Visually predicted pathology on white light (WL) and narrow band imaging (NBI) was recorded. Histopathology results were then reviewed to confirm polyp pathology. Predicted and confirmed pathologies were compared. Colonoscopies were performed with Olympus PCF HQ190L colonoscopes. Results: The 197 patients had a total of 238 polyps. Final pathology classification included hyperplastic polyps, tubular adenomas, and sessile serrated adenomas. WL and NBI predictions were compared to histopathology. Identification of tubular adenomas had AUROC values of 0.92 (NBI) and 0.91 (WL) and sensitivity/specificity of 0.91/0.92 (NBI) and 0.88/0.94 (WL). For hyperplastic polyps, AUROCs were 0.88 (NBI) and 0.87 (WL), with sensitivity/specificity of 0.81/0.95 (NBI) and 0.82/0.93 (WL). Sessile serrated adenomas were identified with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.84 (NBI) and 0.78 (WL) and sensitivity/specificity of 0.73/0.94 (NBI) and 0.67/0.92 (WL). Chi-square analysis confirmed statistical significance between both modalities and final pathology (P < 0.001 for WL and NBI). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that experienced gastroenterologists can use real-time visual assessment to achieve high diagnostic accuracy in polyp characterization across all major histological types. When compared to recent AI-based systems, which report AUROC values between 0.83–0.94, these results show that trained endoscopists perform on par with or even exceed the precision of machine learning tools. This study reinforces the enduring value of endoscopic expertise and supports the continued emphasis on training and visual recognition skills among gastroenterologists.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129744.15433.8c
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S571 Accuracy of Visual Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Pathology in a Real-World Setting

Jayati Anand, Maya Gogtay, Curuchi Anand, Yuvaraj Singh
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S571 Accuracy of Visual Prediction of Colorectal Polyp Pathology in a Real-World Setting

Jayati Anand, Maya Gogtay, Curuchi Anand, Yuvaraj Singh
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Predicting the histology of colon polyps during colonoscopy using real-time visual assessment has clinical relevance. Accurate characterization guides immediate clinical decisions, like the need for polypectomy, and reduces unnecessary procedures, risks and costs. Traditionally, polyps are classified by histopathology, but emerging tools, including artificial intelligence, offer real-time, non-invasive characterization. Experienced gastroenterologists can make accurate predictions without these tools. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of visual prediction of colon polyp pathology in a community based colonoscopy setting. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy at a community hospital with identified polyps over 2 months were included. Visually predicted pathology on white light (WL) and narrow band imaging (NBI) was recorded. Histopathology results were then reviewed to confirm polyp pathology. Predicted and confirmed pathologies were compared. Colonoscopies were performed with Olympus PCF HQ190L colonoscopes. Results: The 197 patients had a total of 238 polyps. Final pathology classification included hyperplastic polyps, tubular adenomas, and sessile serrated adenomas. WL and NBI predictions were compared to histopathology. Identification of tubular adenomas had AUROC values of 0.92 (NBI) and 0.91 (WL) and sensitivity/specificity of 0.91/0.92 (NBI) and 0.88/0.94 (WL). For hyperplastic polyps, AUROCs were 0.88 (NBI) and 0.87 (WL), with sensitivity/specificity of 0.81/0.95 (NBI) and 0.82/0.93 (WL). Sessile serrated adenomas were identified with area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of 0.84 (NBI) and 0.78 (WL) and sensitivity/specificity of 0.73/0.94 (NBI) and 0.67/0.92 (WL). Chi-square analysis confirmed statistical significance between both modalities and final pathology (P < 0.001 for WL and NBI). Conclusion: These results demonstrate that experienced gastroenterologists can use real-time visual assessment to achieve high diagnostic accuracy in polyp characterization across all major histological types. When compared to recent AI-based systems, which report AUROC values between 0.83–0.94, these results show that trained endoscopists perform on par with or even exceed the precision of machine learning tools. This study reinforces the enduring value of endoscopic expertise and supports the continued emphasis on training and visual recognition skills among gastroenterologists.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.