S505 Safety and Predictors of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. In cirrhotic patients, coagulopathy and portal hypertension heighten bleeding risk during endoscopic procedures. Colonoscopy is routinely performed during liver transplant evaluation, yet the safety of polypectomy and predictors of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in this population remain poorly defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cirrhotic patients who underwent colonoscopy for transplant evaluation at a tertiary center (2020–2022). Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were reviewed, including polyp characteristics and adverse outcomes (immediate/delayed PPB, hospitalization, transfusion, perforation, death). Statistical comparisons used t-tests and chi-squared tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PPB, with significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: Among 240 screened patients, 45 underwent 53 colonoscopies with 120 polyps removed. Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) occurred in 8 cases: 7 immediate (5.8%) and 1 delayed (0.8%). All bleeding was managed endoscopically without major complications. One patient (1.9%) required hospitalization, and 4 (7.5%) underwent repeat colonoscopy. No perforations, transfusions, or deaths occurred. Univariate analysis identified elevated bilirubin (0.7–53.8 mg/dL), international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5, lower sodium level (120–147 mEq/L), esophageal varices, larger polyp size, right-sided location, and hot snare use as risk factors for PPB. On multivariate analysis, polyp size, elevated bilirubin, and hot snare use remained significant predictors. No associations were found with age, sex, albumin, platelet count, creatinine, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0, Child-Pugh score, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or prior gastrointestinal bleeding. Polyp morphology and histology did not differ between bleeding and non-bleeding cases. Conclusion: Polypectomy appears safe in cirrhotic patients, with a low risk of major complications. Consistent with prior studies, PPB risk was linked to INR, esophageal varices, right-sided lesions, and hot snare use. Notably, elevated bilirubin and lower sodium level was also associated with PPB—potential novel markers requiring further validation. Traditional risk factors such as age, low platelets, or ascites were not significant in this cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine risk stratification and improve procedural safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129480.53874.dc
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S505 Safety and Predictors of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Aaron Schluger, Elona Poltiyelova, Shirley Eng, Shireen Pais et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

S505 Safety and Predictors of Post-Polypectomy Bleeding in Cirrhotic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Aaron Schluger, Elona Poltiyelova, Shirley Eng, Shireen Pais, Maxwell Charlat, Daniel Basta, Anila Kumar, Nikki Chati, Weihua Tang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. In cirrhotic patients, coagulopathy and portal hypertension heighten bleeding risk during endoscopic procedures. Colonoscopy is routinely performed during liver transplant evaluation, yet the safety of polypectomy and predictors of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in this population remain poorly defined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of cirrhotic patients who underwent colonoscopy for transplant evaluation at a tertiary center (2020–2022). Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic data were reviewed, including polyp characteristics and adverse outcomes (immediate/delayed PPB, hospitalization, transfusion, perforation, death). Statistical comparisons used t-tests and chi-squared tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of PPB, with significance set at P ≤ 0.05. Results: Among 240 screened patients, 45 underwent 53 colonoscopies with 120 polyps removed. Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) occurred in 8 cases: 7 immediate (5.8%) and 1 delayed (0.8%). All bleeding was managed endoscopically without major complications. One patient (1.9%) required hospitalization, and 4 (7.5%) underwent repeat colonoscopy. No perforations, transfusions, or deaths occurred. Univariate analysis identified elevated bilirubin (0.7–53.8 mg/dL), international normalized ratio (INR) >1.5, lower sodium level (120–147 mEq/L), esophageal varices, larger polyp size, right-sided location, and hot snare use as risk factors for PPB. On multivariate analysis, polyp size, elevated bilirubin, and hot snare use remained significant predictors. No associations were found with age, sex, albumin, platelet count, creatinine, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease 3.0, Child-Pugh score, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, or prior gastrointestinal bleeding. Polyp morphology and histology did not differ between bleeding and non-bleeding cases. Conclusion: Polypectomy appears safe in cirrhotic patients, with a low risk of major complications. Consistent with prior studies, PPB risk was linked to INR, esophageal varices, right-sided lesions, and hot snare use. Notably, elevated bilirubin and lower sodium level was also associated with PPB—potential novel markers requiring further validation. Traditional risk factors such as age, low platelets, or ascites were not significant in this cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to refine risk stratification and improve procedural safety.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.