S616 Long-Term Outcomes Following Resection of Large and Complex Colorectal Polyps

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend a follow-up colonoscopy 6 months after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). However, recent research suggests that the risk of residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) is low for selected LNPCPs, with no significant difference in RRA rates between 6- and 12-month surveillance intervals. In this study, we examined whether RRA rates differed between early and late surveillance periods following endoscopic resection of LNPCPs in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included KPNC patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of LNPCPs ≥20 mm between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022, and had a follow-up colonoscopy within 24 months. The primary outcomes were the rates of RRA, defined as any adenoma found at the prior EMR site, and synchronous advanced neoplasia, defined as adenocarcinoma, conventional adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, villous or tubulovillous histology, or any conventional adenoma >10 mm found outside the EMR site. RRA and synchronous advanced neoplasia rates were calculated overall, by LNPCP histology, and by timing of follow-up colonoscopy: early (3–10 months) and late (11–24 months). Results: A total of 442 LNPCPs underwent EMR, with an overall RRA rate of 16.7%. Of these, 294 had follow-up colonoscopy during the early surveillance period and 148 during the late period. The RRA rates for early and late surveillance were 17.7% and 14.9%, respectively, with no significant difference between them. However, when stratified by LNPCP histology, RRA rates differed significantly: high-grade dysplasia (24.1%), villous or tubulovillous adenoma (22.7%), sessile serrated adenoma (14.5%), and other conventional adenomas (12.2%). The overall rate of synchronous advanced neoplasia was 7.2%, with no significant variation by surveillance period or histology type. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in RRA rates of LNPCPs between early and late surveillance periods. Advanced histology was linked to higher RRA risk, with high-grade dysplasia posing the greatest risk and conventional adenomas the least. A key limitation was the 35.5% rate of EMR sites lacking biopsy, relying solely on visual inspection, which may have underestimated true RRA rates. Low-risk conventional adenomas may justify extending the first surveillance colonoscopy beyond 6 months.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129924.49280.79
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S616 Long-Term Outcomes Following Resection of Large and Complex Colorectal Polyps

Shiyun Zhu, Sabrina Kailu Zhong, Vincent Zhang, Jeffrey Lee et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

S616 Long-Term Outcomes Following Resection of Large and Complex Colorectal Polyps

Shiyun Zhu, Sabrina Kailu Zhong, Vincent Zhang, Jeffrey Lee, Kevin Su, Nathan Billett
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Current guidelines recommend a follow-up colonoscopy 6 months after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (LNPCPs). However, recent research suggests that the risk of residual or recurrent adenoma (RRA) is low for selected LNPCPs, with no significant difference in RRA rates between 6- and 12-month surveillance intervals. In this study, we examined whether RRA rates differed between early and late surveillance periods following endoscopic resection of LNPCPs in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) population. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included KPNC patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of LNPCPs ≥20 mm between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2022, and had a follow-up colonoscopy within 24 months. The primary outcomes were the rates of RRA, defined as any adenoma found at the prior EMR site, and synchronous advanced neoplasia, defined as adenocarcinoma, conventional adenoma with high-grade dysplasia, villous or tubulovillous histology, or any conventional adenoma >10 mm found outside the EMR site. RRA and synchronous advanced neoplasia rates were calculated overall, by LNPCP histology, and by timing of follow-up colonoscopy: early (3–10 months) and late (11–24 months). Results: A total of 442 LNPCPs underwent EMR, with an overall RRA rate of 16.7%. Of these, 294 had follow-up colonoscopy during the early surveillance period and 148 during the late period. The RRA rates for early and late surveillance were 17.7% and 14.9%, respectively, with no significant difference between them. However, when stratified by LNPCP histology, RRA rates differed significantly: high-grade dysplasia (24.1%), villous or tubulovillous adenoma (22.7%), sessile serrated adenoma (14.5%), and other conventional adenomas (12.2%). The overall rate of synchronous advanced neoplasia was 7.2%, with no significant variation by surveillance period or histology type. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in RRA rates of LNPCPs between early and late surveillance periods. Advanced histology was linked to higher RRA risk, with high-grade dysplasia posing the greatest risk and conventional adenomas the least. A key limitation was the 35.5% rate of EMR sites lacking biopsy, relying solely on visual inspection, which may have underestimated true RRA rates. Low-risk conventional adenomas may justify extending the first surveillance colonoscopy beyond 6 months.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.