S531 One Versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

Introduction: The fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT) is a noninvasive means to test for colorectal cancer. Every province in Canada offers this test for individuals aged 50-74. Our goal was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of one versus 2 abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Methods: Over a 5-year period from 2020 to 2025, 84,489 completed FIT kits were received by the Newfoundland and Labrador colon cancer screening program. A participant completed 2 FIT samples and if one FIT was positive (³100 ng/ml) a colonoscopy was arranged. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and quantitative FIT results. PPV of one versus 2 abnormal FITs was calculated. Results: Overall, 10,237 patients (12.1%) were positive when the FIT was analyzed; 9,203 colonoscopies were completed and 249 (2.7%) colorectal cancers were detected. The number of advanced adenomas was 26.2% and overall adenoma detection rate was 61.9%. Of the 249 cancers detected, 183 patients had both FIT samples positive while 66 patients had one FIT sample positive and one negative, 33 of 249 (13.3%) of all cancers would have been missed if only 1 FIT was analyzed. For 2,415 participants with advanced adenomas 1,194 had 1 FIT positive and 1219 had both positive. If only one FIT test was analyzed 597 advanced adenomas would have been missed. The positive predictive value (PPV) of one vs 2 positive FITs for cancer was 2.4% vs 2.7% (P value < 0.01) and the PPV for advanced adenoma was 19.8% vs 26.2% (P value < 0.01). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 33 additional cancers and an extra 592 advanced adenomas. Absolute FIT values were also higher for patients with 2 FIT positive compared to one FIT positive for both cancer (6,449 vs 5,337) and advanced adenomas (2,243 vs 878). Conclusion: The PPV of 2 positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for both colorectal cancer detection as well as advanced adenomas. The second FIT detected an additional 13% of cancers. This is a significant increase in the number of cancers detected, the downside is that patients have to complete 2 FIT samples as opposed to one. Compliance with 2 samples is less than one. Similar results were noted in that more advanced neoplasia was detected with the addition of a second kit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129584.35529.6e
Primary Topic
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S531 One Versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

Mark Borgaonkar, Brendan McGrath, Scott Antle, Gregory Doyle et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
article

S531 One Versus Two Fecal Immunochemical Tests in the Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia

Mark Borgaonkar, Brendan McGrath, Scott Antle, Gregory Doyle, Jerry McGrath
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT) is a noninvasive means to test for colorectal cancer. Every province in Canada offers this test for individuals aged 50-74. Our goal was to determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of one versus 2 abnormal FIT in the detection of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas. Methods: Over a 5-year period from 2020 to 2025, 84,489 completed FIT kits were received by the Newfoundland and Labrador colon cancer screening program. A participant completed 2 FIT samples and if one FIT was positive (³100 ng/ml) a colonoscopy was arranged. Data collected included demographics, colonoscopy, pathology, and quantitative FIT results. PPV of one versus 2 abnormal FITs was calculated. Results: Overall, 10,237 patients (12.1%) were positive when the FIT was analyzed; 9,203 colonoscopies were completed and 249 (2.7%) colorectal cancers were detected. The number of advanced adenomas was 26.2% and overall adenoma detection rate was 61.9%. Of the 249 cancers detected, 183 patients had both FIT samples positive while 66 patients had one FIT sample positive and one negative, 33 of 249 (13.3%) of all cancers would have been missed if only 1 FIT was analyzed. For 2,415 participants with advanced adenomas 1,194 had 1 FIT positive and 1219 had both positive. If only one FIT test was analyzed 597 advanced adenomas would have been missed. The positive predictive value (PPV) of one vs 2 positive FITs for cancer was 2.4% vs 2.7% (P value < 0.01) and the PPV for advanced adenoma was 19.8% vs 26.2% (P value < 0.01). When the first FIT was negative, the second positive FIT detected 33 additional cancers and an extra 592 advanced adenomas. Absolute FIT values were also higher for patients with 2 FIT positive compared to one FIT positive for both cancer (6,449 vs 5,337) and advanced adenomas (2,243 vs 878). Conclusion: The PPV of 2 positive FITs is superior to one positive FIT for both colorectal cancer detection as well as advanced adenomas. The second FIT detected an additional 13% of cancers. This is a significant increase in the number of cancers detected, the downside is that patients have to complete 2 FIT samples as opposed to one. Compliance with 2 samples is less than one. Similar results were noted in that more advanced neoplasia was detected with the addition of a second kit.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.