S637 A Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Screening in Low, Middle, and High Income Countries

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. CRC is commonly seen in developed countries and CRC burden is often considered a measure of a country’s development due to the observed trend of increased incidence rates with high or increasing human development index (HDI). Developing nations undergoing rapid growth are seeing increased CRC cases. This review compares CRC incidence and mortality across countries of varying income levels and HDI, highlighting the impact of screening programs on these statistics. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify studies that examined CRC incidence, mortality, and screening programs globally. Over 800 papers were identified, 35 full papers reviewed, and 18 studies were included. Results: Oceania, Europe, and Northern America had the highest age-standardized incidence rates and most cases were from very high HDI and high-income countries (HICs) except for Russia, an upper-middle-income country (UMIC).Europe and Oceania had the highest age-standardized mortality rates. LAC and Asia had the next highest age-standardized incidence rates and most cases were from high HDI nations and UMICs, except for Argentina and Japan, very high HDI countries. Africa had the lowest age-standardized incidence with contributions from high and low HDI nations. Asia and Africa had the lowest age-standardized mortality rates. Reductions in mortality have been reported of 15% in the UK, 18% in Denmark, 30% in Japan, 31.7% in China, and 32% in the U.S. due to annual fecal occult blood screenings. Challenges to implementation of screening in low-income countries (LICs) are lack of a cancer registry, lack of awareness of CRC, poor health system infrastructure, and inadequate financial resources. Conclusion: The major burden of CRC is seen in high HDI countries and UMIC to HICs. There is a need for improved screening uptake in HICs and UMICs to reduce the global CRC burden. Mortality rates are impacted by the quality of the screening methods and population-based screening of average-risk individuals is the most effective method for nations with resources. For resource-limited countries, opportunistic screening of high-risk patients may be effective. Cancer registries and educational programs would also benefit LICs. Further studies, should focus on comparing screening uptake in countries with higher mortality rates and validating screening modalities for resource-limited countries.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130008.84502.1f
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S637 A Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Screening in Low, Middle, and High Income Countries

Marquise Soto, Jasmine K Sandhu, Sushrut Ingawale, Pujitha Vallivedu Chennakesavulu et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S637 A Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Screening in Low, Middle, and High Income Countries

Marquise Soto, Jasmine K Sandhu, Sushrut Ingawale, Pujitha Vallivedu Chennakesavulu, Matthew Antony Manoj, Shivani Joshi, Akshay Sharma, P. Jagannath, Corinne Caissie, Charitha Karanam Ramapathy
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. CRC is commonly seen in developed countries and CRC burden is often considered a measure of a country’s development due to the observed trend of increased incidence rates with high or increasing human development index (HDI). Developing nations undergoing rapid growth are seeing increased CRC cases. This review compares CRC incidence and mortality across countries of varying income levels and HDI, highlighting the impact of screening programs on these statistics. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched to identify studies that examined CRC incidence, mortality, and screening programs globally. Over 800 papers were identified, 35 full papers reviewed, and 18 studies were included. Results: Oceania, Europe, and Northern America had the highest age-standardized incidence rates and most cases were from very high HDI and high-income countries (HICs) except for Russia, an upper-middle-income country (UMIC).Europe and Oceania had the highest age-standardized mortality rates. LAC and Asia had the next highest age-standardized incidence rates and most cases were from high HDI nations and UMICs, except for Argentina and Japan, very high HDI countries. Africa had the lowest age-standardized incidence with contributions from high and low HDI nations. Asia and Africa had the lowest age-standardized mortality rates. Reductions in mortality have been reported of 15% in the UK, 18% in Denmark, 30% in Japan, 31.7% in China, and 32% in the U.S. due to annual fecal occult blood screenings. Challenges to implementation of screening in low-income countries (LICs) are lack of a cancer registry, lack of awareness of CRC, poor health system infrastructure, and inadequate financial resources. Conclusion: The major burden of CRC is seen in high HDI countries and UMIC to HICs. There is a need for improved screening uptake in HICs and UMICs to reduce the global CRC burden. Mortality rates are impacted by the quality of the screening methods and population-based screening of average-risk individuals is the most effective method for nations with resources. For resource-limited countries, opportunistic screening of high-risk patients may be effective. Cancer registries and educational programs would also benefit LICs. Further studies, should focus on comparing screening uptake in countries with higher mortality rates and validating screening modalities for resource-limited countries.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.