S563 Unequal Access, Uneven Preps: How Insurance and Economic Status Impact Colonoscopy Preparation—Insights from a National Database

Introduction: Race significantly influences the quality of colon preparation for colonoscopies, which are vital for early colorectal cancer detection and prevention. Disparities exist among racial groups, shaped by cultural norms, healthcare access, and personal health behaviors. This study examines these factors to better understand the root causes of such inequalities. These insights can help healthcare providers and policymakers improve equity in colorectal cancer prevention and ensure fair access to effective screening. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed colonoscopy records from 2010 to 2023. Data included information on colonoscopy reports, gender, race, colon preparation quality, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage. Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate the relationships between poor colon preparation and categorical variables, including race, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the combined impact of these variables on colon preparation outcomes. Statistical significance was determined with a P-value threshold of 0.05. Results: The study included data from 3,330 individuals who underwent colonoscopies between 2010 and 2023, with 64% of participants being female. Racial demographics were as follows: 24.2% Hispanic, 48% White, 15% Black, 6% Asian, and 3% Other. Analysis revealed a significant association between race and poor colon preparation (Chi-square = 40.78, P < 0.01), with Hispanics experiencing the highest rate of poor outcomes (P = 0.023). Additionally, lower socioeconomic status showed a strong correlation with inadequate preparation (Chi-square ≈ 20.86, P ≈ 0.00011), and the lack of insurance was also significantly associated with poor outcomes (Chi-square ≈ 15.48, P ≈ 0.000083). Conclusion: This study highlights significant disparities in colon preparation quality among racial groups, with outcomes heavily influenced by socioeconomic status and insurance coverage. The findings emphasize that race, financial constraints, and lack of insurance are critical determinants of colonoscopy preparation quality. Despite its limitations, this study underscores the importance of addressing these disparities. Healthcare providers and policymakers must incorporate these demographic considerations into strategies to ensure equitable access to colorectal cancer screenings and improve prevention efforts for underserved populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129712.35441.9c
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S563 Unequal Access, Uneven Preps: How Insurance and Economic Status Impact Colonoscopy Preparation—Insights from a National Database

Sai Reshma Magam, Sri Harsha Boppana, Cesar Orlando Ortiz Bernard, Sindhuja Giridharan et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S563 Unequal Access, Uneven Preps: How Insurance and Economic Status Impact Colonoscopy Preparation—Insights from a National Database

Sai Reshma Magam, Sri Harsha Boppana, Cesar Orlando Ortiz Bernard, Sindhuja Giridharan, Paul Mustacchia, Amina Zafar, Amilcar Guaschino, Wing Hang Lau, Leeza Pannikodu, Rajmohan Rammohan, Achal Patel, Krishnaiyer Subramani, Dilman Natt, Venkata Panchagnula
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Race significantly influences the quality of colon preparation for colonoscopies, which are vital for early colorectal cancer detection and prevention. Disparities exist among racial groups, shaped by cultural norms, healthcare access, and personal health behaviors. This study examines these factors to better understand the root causes of such inequalities. These insights can help healthcare providers and policymakers improve equity in colorectal cancer prevention and ensure fair access to effective screening. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed colonoscopy records from 2010 to 2023. Data included information on colonoscopy reports, gender, race, colon preparation quality, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage. Chi-squared tests were used to evaluate the relationships between poor colon preparation and categorical variables, including race, socioeconomic status, and insurance status. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the combined impact of these variables on colon preparation outcomes. Statistical significance was determined with a P-value threshold of 0.05. Results: The study included data from 3,330 individuals who underwent colonoscopies between 2010 and 2023, with 64% of participants being female. Racial demographics were as follows: 24.2% Hispanic, 48% White, 15% Black, 6% Asian, and 3% Other. Analysis revealed a significant association between race and poor colon preparation (Chi-square = 40.78, P < 0.01), with Hispanics experiencing the highest rate of poor outcomes (P = 0.023). Additionally, lower socioeconomic status showed a strong correlation with inadequate preparation (Chi-square ≈ 20.86, P ≈ 0.00011), and the lack of insurance was also significantly associated with poor outcomes (Chi-square ≈ 15.48, P ≈ 0.000083). Conclusion: This study highlights significant disparities in colon preparation quality among racial groups, with outcomes heavily influenced by socioeconomic status and insurance coverage. The findings emphasize that race, financial constraints, and lack of insurance are critical determinants of colonoscopy preparation quality. Despite its limitations, this study underscores the importance of addressing these disparities. Healthcare providers and policymakers must incorporate these demographic considerations into strategies to ensure equitable access to colorectal cancer screenings and improve prevention efforts for underserved populations.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.