S568 Discriminatory Value of C-Reactive Protein in Differentiating Appendiceal Adenomucous Carcinoma From Acute Infectious Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Adenomucous carcinoma of the appendix is an uncommon malignancy that often presents with signs indistinguishable from acute appendicitis. While imaging and clinical evaluation are the mainstays of diagnosis, they frequently fail to differentiate between inflammatory and malignant causes of right lower quadrant pain. C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant, is widely utilized to assess the severity of appendicitis. Its potential role in differentiating appendiceal neoplasms from acute appendicitis has been proposed, given the typically lower inflammatory response in malignancy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the discriminatory utility of CRP in distinguishing appendiceal adenomucous carcinoma from acute appendicitis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2025. Studies included were observational cohorts or case-control studies that reported CRP values in both histologically confirmed appendiceal carcinoma and acute appendicitis. Data were extracted on mean or median CRP values, standard deviations or interquartile ranges, and diagnostic thresholds. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Eight studies encompassing 4,912 patients (198 with appendiceal carcinoma and 4,714 with acute appendicitis) met inclusion criteria. The pooled CRP level was significantly lower in the carcinoma group (SMD −1.12; 95% CI −1.47 to −0.77; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of studies using a CRP cutoff <30 mg/L demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 76% for detecting carcinoma in patients with right lower quadrant pain. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I² = 52%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that lower CRP levels may help distinguish appendiceal adenomucous carcinoma from acute appendicitis. While CRP alone is not diagnostic, disproportionately low CRP in the setting of significant or chronic symptoms should raise suspicion for underlying malignancy. Incorporating CRP thresholds into clinical decision-making may enhance early detection of appendiceal neoplasms and improve preoperative planning. Further prospective studies are needed to discern the clinical validity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129732.84913.08
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S568 Discriminatory Value of C-Reactive Protein in Differentiating Appendiceal Adenomucous Carcinoma From Acute Infectious Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aizaaz Khan, Faiza Chaudhary
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

S568 Discriminatory Value of C-Reactive Protein in Differentiating Appendiceal Adenomucous Carcinoma From Acute Infectious Appendicitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aizaaz Khan, Faiza Chaudhary
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Adenomucous carcinoma of the appendix is an uncommon malignancy that often presents with signs indistinguishable from acute appendicitis. While imaging and clinical evaluation are the mainstays of diagnosis, they frequently fail to differentiate between inflammatory and malignant causes of right lower quadrant pain. C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant, is widely utilized to assess the severity of appendicitis. Its potential role in differentiating appendiceal neoplasms from acute appendicitis has been proposed, given the typically lower inflammatory response in malignancy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the discriminatory utility of CRP in distinguishing appendiceal adenomucous carcinoma from acute appendicitis. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2025. Studies included were observational cohorts or case-control studies that reported CRP values in both histologically confirmed appendiceal carcinoma and acute appendicitis. Data were extracted on mean or median CRP values, standard deviations or interquartile ranges, and diagnostic thresholds. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Eight studies encompassing 4,912 patients (198 with appendiceal carcinoma and 4,714 with acute appendicitis) met inclusion criteria. The pooled CRP level was significantly lower in the carcinoma group (SMD −1.12; 95% CI −1.47 to −0.77; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of studies using a CRP cutoff <30 mg/L demonstrated a sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 76% for detecting carcinoma in patients with right lower quadrant pain. Heterogeneity among studies was moderate (I² = 52%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis supports the hypothesis that lower CRP levels may help distinguish appendiceal adenomucous carcinoma from acute appendicitis. While CRP alone is not diagnostic, disproportionately low CRP in the setting of significant or chronic symptoms should raise suspicion for underlying malignancy. Incorporating CRP thresholds into clinical decision-making may enhance early detection of appendiceal neoplasms and improve preoperative planning. Further prospective studies are needed to discern the clinical validity.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.