S647 Diagnostic Outcomes and Demographic Patterns After Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in a US Cohort

Introduction: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests, including Cologuard, provide a noninvasive approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, real-world outcomes and demographic variations following positive results remain insufficiently studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a federated platform aggregating de-identified electronic health records from 67 healthcare organizations. Adults aged 45–85 who received a positive multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test (LOINC 77354-9) between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024, and subsequently underwent colonoscopy (CPT 1022231) were included. Patients without follow-up colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA result were excluded. Primary outcomes were incidence proportions of colorectal cancer (ICD-10: C18–C21), adenomas (D12), and diverticulosis (K57). TriNetX calculated incidence proportions and stratified results by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Results: A total of 12,543 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 65 years (SD ±9), with 53.8% female and 87.5% identifying as White. Only 3.0% were Hispanic/Latino, while ethnicity data were unknown in 38.5%. Diagnostic colonoscopy revealed adenomas in 58.4% of patients, diverticulosis in 38.8%, and CRC in 2.6%. Men had a significantly higher incidence of both CRC (3.2% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001) and adenomas (63.4% vs 54.2%, P < 0.001) compared to women. Racial disparities were notable American Indian or Alaska Native patients had the highest CRC incidence (28.6%) and adenoma prevalence (73.5%), though subgroup sample size constraints may affect generalizability. Asian and Black patients had slightly higher CRC rates compared to White patients (4.3% and 3.9% vs 2.4%). CRC incidence increased with age, peaking at 6.7% in the 80–84 age group. Diverticulosis rates also increased with age, affecting nearly 60% of those aged 80–84. Conclusion: Following a positive mt-sDNA test, nearly 60% of patients were found to have adenomas, and 1 in 40 had CRC. Diagnostic yields varied substantially across age, sex, and race, with older adults and racial minorities, particularly American Indian or Alaska Native patients, experiencing disproportionately higher rates of CRC and adenomas. These findings show the diagnostic value of mt-sDNA testing and highlight disparities in post-screening outcomes, reinforcing the necessity of timely colonoscopy follow-up and advocating for more equitable CRC screening initiatives tailored to diverse populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130048.02721.5d
Primary Topic
Tumors and Oncological Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S647 Diagnostic Outcomes and Demographic Patterns After Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in a US Cohort

Mohammad Abuassi, Mahmoud Y. Madi, Kinan Obeidat
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Tumors and Oncological Cases
article

S647 Diagnostic Outcomes and Demographic Patterns After Positive Multitarget Stool DNA Screening in a US Cohort

Mohammad Abuassi, Mahmoud Y. Madi, Kinan Obeidat
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) tests, including Cologuard, provide a noninvasive approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, real-world outcomes and demographic variations following positive results remain insufficiently studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, a federated platform aggregating de-identified electronic health records from 67 healthcare organizations. Adults aged 45–85 who received a positive multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test (LOINC 77354-9) between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2024, and subsequently underwent colonoscopy (CPT 1022231) were included. Patients without follow-up colonoscopy after a positive mt-sDNA result were excluded. Primary outcomes were incidence proportions of colorectal cancer (ICD-10: C18–C21), adenomas (D12), and diverticulosis (K57). TriNetX calculated incidence proportions and stratified results by age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Results: A total of 12,543 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 65 years (SD ±9), with 53.8% female and 87.5% identifying as White. Only 3.0% were Hispanic/Latino, while ethnicity data were unknown in 38.5%. Diagnostic colonoscopy revealed adenomas in 58.4% of patients, diverticulosis in 38.8%, and CRC in 2.6%. Men had a significantly higher incidence of both CRC (3.2% vs 2.0%, P < 0.001) and adenomas (63.4% vs 54.2%, P < 0.001) compared to women. Racial disparities were notable American Indian or Alaska Native patients had the highest CRC incidence (28.6%) and adenoma prevalence (73.5%), though subgroup sample size constraints may affect generalizability. Asian and Black patients had slightly higher CRC rates compared to White patients (4.3% and 3.9% vs 2.4%). CRC incidence increased with age, peaking at 6.7% in the 80–84 age group. Diverticulosis rates also increased with age, affecting nearly 60% of those aged 80–84. Conclusion: Following a positive mt-sDNA test, nearly 60% of patients were found to have adenomas, and 1 in 40 had CRC. Diagnostic yields varied substantially across age, sex, and race, with older adults and racial minorities, particularly American Indian or Alaska Native patients, experiencing disproportionately higher rates of CRC and adenomas. These findings show the diagnostic value of mt-sDNA testing and highlight disparities in post-screening outcomes, reinforcing the necessity of timely colonoscopy follow-up and advocating for more equitable CRC screening initiatives tailored to diverse populations.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Tumors and Oncological Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.