S601 Role of Cell-Free DNA in Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In 2025, it is estimated to cause 7.6% of all new cancer cases and 8.6% of all cancer deaths in the US. While colonoscopy remains the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening, its invasive nature makes compliance poor. Recently, circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) has gained attention as a less invasive modality for early detection of colorectal cancer. Methods: This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA from blood samples for early detection of CRC. Literature search was carried out on PUBMED and Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2020 and May 2025. After screening 29 studies for eligibility, 9 studies involving a total of 118639 participants were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed for screening and data extraction. Results: Among 9 studies included, 6 focused on cfDNA and 3 addressed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Five studied the methylation profiles including one focusing on HAND1 and SEPT9 gene, whereas 3 evaluated cfDNA fragmentation. Significant findings include 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity of cfDNA for diagnosing CRC. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) was an important biomarker with 72-91% area under curve (AUC) for detecting CRC, and hazard ratio of 3.3 on Kaplan-meier analysis. cfDNA fragmentation analysis revealed >90% sensitivity and upto 98% specificity for CRC detection. Studies focusing on ctDNA showed significantly higher median ctDNA concentration (P < 0.001) and higher methylation scores with more positive loci in CRC patients compared to the healthy population. 5hmC as a biomarker had 84% sensitivity and 92% specificity. HAND1 gene methylation was more promising with 93% sensitivity and 80% specificity, contrast to SEPT9 gene with 67% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Conclusion: Findings from this review underscore that cfDNA, along with epigenetic methylation and fragmentation analysis, is a promising non-invasive assay for early detection of CRC. While this could be an accurate test for CRC screening in future, extensive studies comparing it to existing modalities are needed. Fact that this non-invasive test can be beneficial for CRC screening in the underserved population, where cancer screening is still a question, needs further attention. Disclosure: AI was used for grammar check.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001129864.82023.bc
Primary Topic
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S601 Role of Cell-Free DNA in Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Jasmin Hundal, Devendra D. Patel, Ashiya Loomba
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
article

S601 Role of Cell-Free DNA in Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review

Jasmin Hundal, Devendra D. Patel, Ashiya Loomba
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is globally the third most common cancer and second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. In 2025, it is estimated to cause 7.6% of all new cancer cases and 8.6% of all cancer deaths in the US. While colonoscopy remains the gold standard for colorectal cancer screening, its invasive nature makes compliance poor. Recently, circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) has gained attention as a less invasive modality for early detection of colorectal cancer. Methods: This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cfDNA from blood samples for early detection of CRC. Literature search was carried out on PUBMED and Cochrane Library for studies published between January 2020 and May 2025. After screening 29 studies for eligibility, 9 studies involving a total of 118639 participants were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed for screening and data extraction. Results: Among 9 studies included, 6 focused on cfDNA and 3 addressed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Five studied the methylation profiles including one focusing on HAND1 and SEPT9 gene, whereas 3 evaluated cfDNA fragmentation. Significant findings include 83% sensitivity and 90% specificity of cfDNA for diagnosing CRC. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) was an important biomarker with 72-91% area under curve (AUC) for detecting CRC, and hazard ratio of 3.3 on Kaplan-meier analysis. cfDNA fragmentation analysis revealed >90% sensitivity and upto 98% specificity for CRC detection. Studies focusing on ctDNA showed significantly higher median ctDNA concentration (P < 0.001) and higher methylation scores with more positive loci in CRC patients compared to the healthy population. 5hmC as a biomarker had 84% sensitivity and 92% specificity. HAND1 gene methylation was more promising with 93% sensitivity and 80% specificity, contrast to SEPT9 gene with 67% sensitivity and 87% specificity. Conclusion: Findings from this review underscore that cfDNA, along with epigenetic methylation and fragmentation analysis, is a promising non-invasive assay for early detection of CRC. While this could be an accurate test for CRC screening in future, extensive studies comparing it to existing modalities are needed. Fact that this non-invasive test can be beneficial for CRC screening in the underserved population, where cancer screening is still a question, needs further attention. Disclosure: AI was used for grammar check.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.