S642 Looking Again, Planning Better: Right Colon Second Inspection Alters Surveillance Timing

Introduction: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) constitutes 2-10% of CRC cases, with 6% diagnosed within 3 years after negative colonoscopy. Most PCCRCs are found in the right colon (RC). A 2nd inspection of the RC increases adenoma detection rate (ADR), but its effect on CRC surveillance timing per recent U.S. guidelines is unknown. Methods: This ad hoc analysis used data from a prior quality improvement initiative standardizing documentation of RC 2nd inspection in our practice. Patients with confirmed RC 2nd inspection during screening, surveillance, or FIT positive colonoscopy were included. Surveillance intervals were determined using the United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer 2020 Guidelines. To simulate a standard single RC inspection, adenomas identified exclusively during the 2nd RC inspection were excluded and surveillance intervals were recalculated. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a change in surveillance interval when comparing scenarios with and without RC 2nd inspection. Secondary endpoint was false negative rate (FNR): proportion of patients with ≥1 adenoma found on RC 2nd inspection who would have had no adenomas detected (negative colonoscopy) without the 2nd inspection. Descriptive statistics and adenoma mean and standard deviation were performed. Results: Of 399 colonoscopies with 2 RC inspections, mean number of adenomas and advanced adenomas (>10 mm, high grade dysplasia, tubulovillous) detected on RC 2nd inspection was 1.47 (SD 0.99) and 0.26 (SD 0.07), respectively. RC 2nd inspection identified 144 additional adenomas (132 tubular; 12 sessile serrated) and 7 advanced adenomas in 98 patients. Of these, 91 had ≥1 adenoma, 5 had ≥1 adenoma plus advanced adenoma, and 2 had only advanced adenomas found on 2nd inspection. 44.9% (44/98) subjects had shorter surveillance intervals; 55.1% (54/98) had no change. Out of 83 subjects with negative colonoscopy when not accounting for RC 2nd inspection, 13 had adenomas found exclusively with 2nd inspection (FNR = 15.7%). Conclusion: Our findings suggest RC 2nd inspection is associated with shortened surveillance intervals for CRC. Detection of additional adenomas during 2nd inspection can reclassify patients into higher risk categories, necessitating surveillance colonoscopy at more frequent intervals. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of this practice on PCCRC and CRC mortality.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130028.99728.84
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S642 Looking Again, Planning Better: Right Colon Second Inspection Alters Surveillance Timing

Amy Gravely, Lisa A. Smith, Tessa Herman, Daniela Guerrero Vinsard et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

S642 Looking Again, Planning Better: Right Colon Second Inspection Alters Surveillance Timing

Amy Gravely, Lisa A. Smith, Tessa Herman, Daniela Guerrero Vinsard, Mohammad Bilal, Erica Loon, Brian L. Hanson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) constitutes 2-10% of CRC cases, with 6% diagnosed within 3 years after negative colonoscopy. Most PCCRCs are found in the right colon (RC). A 2nd inspection of the RC increases adenoma detection rate (ADR), but its effect on CRC surveillance timing per recent U.S. guidelines is unknown. Methods: This ad hoc analysis used data from a prior quality improvement initiative standardizing documentation of RC 2nd inspection in our practice. Patients with confirmed RC 2nd inspection during screening, surveillance, or FIT positive colonoscopy were included. Surveillance intervals were determined using the United States Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer 2020 Guidelines. To simulate a standard single RC inspection, adenomas identified exclusively during the 2nd RC inspection were excluded and surveillance intervals were recalculated. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a change in surveillance interval when comparing scenarios with and without RC 2nd inspection. Secondary endpoint was false negative rate (FNR): proportion of patients with ≥1 adenoma found on RC 2nd inspection who would have had no adenomas detected (negative colonoscopy) without the 2nd inspection. Descriptive statistics and adenoma mean and standard deviation were performed. Results: Of 399 colonoscopies with 2 RC inspections, mean number of adenomas and advanced adenomas (>10 mm, high grade dysplasia, tubulovillous) detected on RC 2nd inspection was 1.47 (SD 0.99) and 0.26 (SD 0.07), respectively. RC 2nd inspection identified 144 additional adenomas (132 tubular; 12 sessile serrated) and 7 advanced adenomas in 98 patients. Of these, 91 had ≥1 adenoma, 5 had ≥1 adenoma plus advanced adenoma, and 2 had only advanced adenomas found on 2nd inspection. 44.9% (44/98) subjects had shorter surveillance intervals; 55.1% (54/98) had no change. Out of 83 subjects with negative colonoscopy when not accounting for RC 2nd inspection, 13 had adenomas found exclusively with 2nd inspection (FNR = 15.7%). Conclusion: Our findings suggest RC 2nd inspection is associated with shortened surveillance intervals for CRC. Detection of additional adenomas during 2nd inspection can reclassify patients into higher risk categories, necessitating surveillance colonoscopy at more frequent intervals. Further studies are needed to understand the impact of this practice on PCCRC and CRC mortality.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.