S652 Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in Active and Retired Workers in the United States of America: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Comorbidities, and Physical Activity Impact

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, various medical and physical activities were disrupted because of the enacted lockdown. In this study, we examined the impact of the pandemic, comorbidities, and physical activities on the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rate in the United States (U.S.) among active and retired U.S. workers. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the National Cancer Institute National Trends Survey (HINTS 5), cycle 4. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate the association between CRC screening, comorbidities, and physical activity in the general population, active, and retired workers. Frequency, percentage, and standard errors were calculated for all categorical variables. Median, interquartile range, and standard errors are presented for numeric variables. Weighted values, according to HINTS 5 Cycle 4, were reported. All analyses were performed in R (R Core Team, 2022) and assumed a 2-sided, 5% level of significance. P-values were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing using a Bonferroni correction. Results: In the dataset, there were 147,216,623 employed households, compared to 51,002,444 that were retired. In the general population, the odds of being screened for CRC were lower during the pandemic (P < 0.05), and the odds of screening for CRC were higher in individuals with diabetes and a heart condition (P < 0.05). The odds of being screened for CRC did not differ in those with a lung disease or suffering from depression (P > 0.05). There was no association between moderate exercise and being screened for CRC. In the subpopulation of active and retired workers, there was no longer an association between the pandemic and CRC screening (P > 0.05), and no association between moderate exercise and being screened for CRC (P > 0.05). The Odds of being screened for CRC were not affected by active and retired workers with lung disease or depression (P > 0.05). The odds of CRC screening in active and retired workers were higher in individuals with diabetes or a heart condition (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The odds of being screened in the general population were lower during the pandemic, a reason was that in-person diagnostic methods were stopped, postponed, or greatly reduced during the pandemic. Non-invasive screening methods should be encouraged and easily accessible in conjunction with telehealth. Screening kits can be mailed to the places of residence of individuals when there is a lockdown.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001130068.48581.1b
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S652 Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in Active and Retired Workers in the United States of America: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Comorbidities, and Physical Activity Impact

Oladoyin Jolaoye, Sonu Dhillon, Rooma Nankani
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
article

S652 Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening in Active and Retired Workers in the United States of America: An Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic, Comorbidities, and Physical Activity Impact

Oladoyin Jolaoye, Sonu Dhillon, Rooma Nankani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, various medical and physical activities were disrupted because of the enacted lockdown. In this study, we examined the impact of the pandemic, comorbidities, and physical activities on the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rate in the United States (U.S.) among active and retired U.S. workers. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study using data from the National Cancer Institute National Trends Survey (HINTS 5), cycle 4. We used the Chi-square test to evaluate the association between CRC screening, comorbidities, and physical activity in the general population, active, and retired workers. Frequency, percentage, and standard errors were calculated for all categorical variables. Median, interquartile range, and standard errors are presented for numeric variables. Weighted values, according to HINTS 5 Cycle 4, were reported. All analyses were performed in R (R Core Team, 2022) and assumed a 2-sided, 5% level of significance. P-values were adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing using a Bonferroni correction. Results: In the dataset, there were 147,216,623 employed households, compared to 51,002,444 that were retired. In the general population, the odds of being screened for CRC were lower during the pandemic (P < 0.05), and the odds of screening for CRC were higher in individuals with diabetes and a heart condition (P < 0.05). The odds of being screened for CRC did not differ in those with a lung disease or suffering from depression (P > 0.05). There was no association between moderate exercise and being screened for CRC. In the subpopulation of active and retired workers, there was no longer an association between the pandemic and CRC screening (P > 0.05), and no association between moderate exercise and being screened for CRC (P > 0.05). The Odds of being screened for CRC were not affected by active and retired workers with lung disease or depression (P > 0.05). The odds of CRC screening in active and retired workers were higher in individuals with diabetes or a heart condition (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The odds of being screened in the general population were lower during the pandemic, a reason was that in-person diagnostic methods were stopped, postponed, or greatly reduced during the pandemic. Non-invasive screening methods should be encouraged and easily accessible in conjunction with telehealth. Screening kits can be mailed to the places of residence of individuals when there is a lockdown.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.