Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education

ABSTRACT How might science education researchers expand the study of affective and emotional phenomena in ways that afford a better understanding of human learning experiences, support conditions of justice, and affirm learners’ dignity? How far from the realization of these goals we now feel in the fall of 2025. And yet, we persist in pursuing them. In this introductory editorial to the special issue on Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education, we explain what animates this question, introduce the structure of the special issue, and provide an overview of the papers. To us, questions like, “what is the emotion in this situation?” lead to analytical dead ends. They seek to apply a flimsy nametag over a phenomenon that runs much deeper and holds much greater consequence. As affect emerges, how is it channeled and mediated, and by whom? When people apply emotion terms to the ways they feel, what forms of social understanding and possibilities for action follow? Seeking justice and dignity in science education will require us to stop treating emotion as something ready‐made, with uncontested and straightforward meanings, and start treating it as a matter of social coordination and meaning‐making processes, inflected by power, shaped by history, and creating contingent openings for imagining futures and acting on the world. Toward charting these possibilities, we introduce 29 manuscripts (14 original papers and 14 corresponding responses, plus a synthetic essay) that emphasize the social embeddedness of affect and emotion in science teaching and learning rather than interiorizing and individualizing accounts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2025-10-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70028
Primary Topic
Social Science and Policy Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education

Tanner Vea, Lama Z. Jaber
Science Education
Social Science and Policy Research
article

Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education

Tanner Vea, Lama Z. Jaber
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT How might science education researchers expand the study of affective and emotional phenomena in ways that afford a better understanding of human learning experiences, support conditions of justice, and affirm learners’ dignity? How far from the realization of these goals we now feel in the fall of 2025. And yet, we persist in pursuing them. In this introductory editorial to the special issue on Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education, we explain what animates this question, introduce the structure of the special issue, and provide an overview of the papers. To us, questions like, “what is the emotion in this situation?” lead to analytical dead ends. They seek to apply a flimsy nametag over a phenomenon that runs much deeper and holds much greater consequence. As affect emerges, how is it channeled and mediated, and by whom? When people apply emotion terms to the ways they feel, what forms of social understanding and possibilities for action follow? Seeking justice and dignity in science education will require us to stop treating emotion as something ready‐made, with uncontested and straightforward meanings, and start treating it as a matter of social coordination and meaning‐making processes, inflected by power, shaped by history, and creating contingent openings for imagining futures and acting on the world. Toward charting these possibilities, we introduce 29 manuscripts (14 original papers and 14 corresponding responses, plus a synthetic essay) that emphasize the social embeddedness of affect and emotion in science teaching and learning rather than interiorizing and individualizing accounts.

Science EducationVol. 110(1)
Florida State University (US), University of Washington (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Social Science and Policy Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Centering Affect and Emotion Toward Dignity and Justice in Science Education — Tanner Vea, Lama Z. Jaber · Science Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS