S20 Impact of Sarcopenia on Complications in Patients Admitted With Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Analysis

Introduction: Sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle mass, is a known prognostic factor in various illnesses. Acute pancreatitis (AP), an inflammatory pancreatic disorder, involves significant metabolic stress. While malnutrition is linked to increased mortality and costs in AP, the specific impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in hospitalized AP patients remains underexplored. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2022 to identify adult patients (>18 years). Patients with AP were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence of sarcopenia. Patients with missing demographics or mortality data were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association of sarcopenia with various clinical outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, etiology of pancreatitis, and hospital-acquired infections. Results: Out of 2,467,233 patients were admitted with AP, 227,545 (9.2%) diagnosed with sarcopenia. The majority of sarcopenic patients were aged 45-65 years (40.3%), men (53.6%), White (65.2%), and had Medicare insurance (42%). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (7.3% vs 2%), sepsis (7.3% vs 4.6%), shock (14.6% vs 3.6%), acute kidney injury (37.9% vs 18%), deep vein thrombosis (3.7% vs 0.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.7% vs 0.5%), portal vein thrombus (2.8% vs 0.8%) and ileus (7.6% vs 3.2%). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher prevalence of infections such as urinary tract infection (13.4% vs 7.6%), pneumonia (11.7% vs 4%), cholangitis (3.1% vs 2.2%), C. difficile (3.6% vs 1%), and cellulitis (2% vs 0.8%). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with sarcopenia had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-1.41, 95% CI-1.34-1.48, P < 0.001), shock (aOR-1.92, 95% CI-1.85-2.00, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR-1.41, 95% CI-1.41-1.49, P < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (aOR-1.79, 95% CI-1.72-1.87, P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (aOR-1.60, 95% CI-1.41-1.82, P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (aOR-2.37, 95% CI-2.21-2.54, P < 0.001), portal vein thrombus (aOR-2.57, 95% CI-2.38-2.77, P < 0.001) and ileus (aOR-1.70, 95% CI-1.63-1.77, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study notes that AP patients with sarcopenia are at higher risk of worse outcomes compared to those without sarcopenia. Early identification and targeted interventions—such as nutritional support and close monitoring—may help mitigate risks and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126540.52835.04
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S20 Impact of Sarcopenia on Complications in Patients Admitted With Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Analysis

Tushar Sehgal, Carol Singh, Dalbir Sandhu, Aalam Sohal et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

S20 Impact of Sarcopenia on Complications in Patients Admitted With Acute Pancreatitis: A Nationwide Analysis

Tushar Sehgal, Carol Singh, Dalbir Sandhu, Aalam Sohal, Anmol Singh, Suman Bhasker, Vikash Kumar, Mohammad Naseem
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Sarcopenia, the progressive loss of muscle mass, is a known prognostic factor in various illnesses. Acute pancreatitis (AP), an inflammatory pancreatic disorder, involves significant metabolic stress. While malnutrition is linked to increased mortality and costs in AP, the specific impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes in hospitalized AP patients remains underexplored. Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample 2016 to 2022 to identify adult patients (>18 years). Patients with AP were stratified into 2 groups based on the presence of sarcopenia. Patients with missing demographics or mortality data were excluded. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to assess the association of sarcopenia with various clinical outcomes, adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, etiology of pancreatitis, and hospital-acquired infections. Results: Out of 2,467,233 patients were admitted with AP, 227,545 (9.2%) diagnosed with sarcopenia. The majority of sarcopenic patients were aged 45-65 years (40.3%), men (53.6%), White (65.2%), and had Medicare insurance (42%). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (7.3% vs 2%), sepsis (7.3% vs 4.6%), shock (14.6% vs 3.6%), acute kidney injury (37.9% vs 18%), deep vein thrombosis (3.7% vs 0.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.7% vs 0.5%), portal vein thrombus (2.8% vs 0.8%) and ileus (7.6% vs 3.2%). Patients with sarcopenia had a higher prevalence of infections such as urinary tract infection (13.4% vs 7.6%), pneumonia (11.7% vs 4%), cholangitis (3.1% vs 2.2%), C. difficile (3.6% vs 1%), and cellulitis (2% vs 0.8%). After adjusting for confounding factors, patients with sarcopenia had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]-1.41, 95% CI-1.34-1.48, P < 0.001), shock (aOR-1.92, 95% CI-1.85-2.00, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (aOR-1.41, 95% CI-1.41-1.49, P < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (aOR-1.79, 95% CI-1.72-1.87, P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (aOR-1.60, 95% CI-1.41-1.82, P < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (aOR-2.37, 95% CI-2.21-2.54, P < 0.001), portal vein thrombus (aOR-2.57, 95% CI-2.38-2.77, P < 0.001) and ileus (aOR-1.70, 95% CI-1.63-1.77, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Our study notes that AP patients with sarcopenia are at higher risk of worse outcomes compared to those without sarcopenia. Early identification and targeted interventions—such as nutritional support and close monitoring—may help mitigate risks and improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.