S32 Does Fat Fuel the Fire? Relationship Between Pancreatic Steatosis and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most serious adverse effects of ERCP due to its high morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors for PEP have been identified, the role of pancreatic steatosis (PS) remains inadequately explored. Emerging literature suggests a potential relationship with metabolic syndrome as well as an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. There is a gap in understanding its impact on PEP. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between PS and PEP. Methods: Online databases, including Embase, Medline (via PubMed), and Scopus, were searched from inception through March 2025. Studies evaluating the incidence of PEP, including severe PEP, following ERCP were included. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and severity of PEP. Standard meta-analysis methods were followed using the random-effects model. Treatment effect estimates were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Our search yielded 3 studies that met eligibility criteria. They included 1,950 patients. Pancreatic steatosis was present in 523 (26.82%) patients. Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1 [Tables presented at ACG Annual Meeting]. Pooled analysis showed a significant increase in the odds of PEP in patients with PS (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.98-4.82, P < 0.001, I² = 4%). There was also a small trend towards increased odds of moderate-to-severe (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.40-3.23, P = 0.82, I² = 0%) and severe (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.44-6.24, P = 0.45, I² = 0%) pancreatitis in PEP patients with PS, but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that PS may be a significant risk factor for the development of PEP. The overall incidence of PEP was higher in PS group. While the association did not achieve statistical significance, a slight upward trend in the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was noted among patients with pancreatic steatosis (PS). Further high-quality prospective studies are essential to explore pancreatic steatosis which could help to identify high risk patients and implement PEP prevention strategies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126588.15088.37
Primary Topic
Body Contouring and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S32 Does Fat Fuel the Fire? Relationship Between Pancreatic Steatosis and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Baha Aldeen Bani Fawwaz, Tareq Alsaleh, Mohamad Khaled Almujarkesh, Mustafa Arain et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Body Contouring and Surgery
article

S32 Does Fat Fuel the Fire? Relationship Between Pancreatic Steatosis and Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Baha Aldeen Bani Fawwaz, Tareq Alsaleh, Mohamad Khaled Almujarkesh, Mustafa Arain, John George
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP) is one of the most serious adverse effects of ERCP due to its high morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors for PEP have been identified, the role of pancreatic steatosis (PS) remains inadequately explored. Emerging literature suggests a potential relationship with metabolic syndrome as well as an increased risk of acute pancreatitis. There is a gap in understanding its impact on PEP. We thus conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between PS and PEP. Methods: Online databases, including Embase, Medline (via PubMed), and Scopus, were searched from inception through March 2025. Studies evaluating the incidence of PEP, including severe PEP, following ERCP were included. The outcomes of interest were the incidence and severity of PEP. Standard meta-analysis methods were followed using the random-effects model. Treatment effect estimates were expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Results: Our search yielded 3 studies that met eligibility criteria. They included 1,950 patients. Pancreatic steatosis was present in 523 (26.82%) patients. Study characteristics are summarized in Table 1 [Tables presented at ACG Annual Meeting]. Pooled analysis showed a significant increase in the odds of PEP in patients with PS (OR 3.09, 95% CI 1.98-4.82, P < 0.001, I² = 4%). There was also a small trend towards increased odds of moderate-to-severe (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.40-3.23, P = 0.82, I² = 0%) and severe (OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.44-6.24, P = 0.45, I² = 0%) pancreatitis in PEP patients with PS, but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that PS may be a significant risk factor for the development of PEP. The overall incidence of PEP was higher in PS group. While the association did not achieve statistical significance, a slight upward trend in the severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was noted among patients with pancreatic steatosis (PS). Further high-quality prospective studies are essential to explore pancreatic steatosis which could help to identify high risk patients and implement PEP prevention strategies.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Body Contouring and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.