S28 Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Studies from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry have indicated a rise in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases among individuals under 60 years of age in recent years. Early-onset PDAC has been linked to family history of pancreatic cancer, metabolic syndrome, smoking, pancreatitis, and germline mutations. However, risk factors contributing to early presentation remain poorly defined. We aim to analyze clinicopathological/demographic differences in early diagnosis of PDAC (defined as age ≤60 years) vs a late diagnosis (defined as age >60 years). Methods: Clinicopathological/demographic data was retrospectively collected from patients diagnosed with pancreatic neoplasms at our tertiary-care center from 2014 to 2023. MRNs were extracted via TriNetX and de-identified under IRB approval. Patients without PDAC or staging were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v29.0. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics. Survival was assessed via Kaplan-Meier and compared via log-rank test. Hazard function illustrated time-dependent risk. Variables associated with survival (P < 0.25) in univariate cox regression were included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to estimate adjusted hazard ratios. Results: Of the 133 patients (33 early-age and 100 late-age), the early-age group had higher proportions of male gender (67% vs 51%), Hispanic ethnicity (12% vs 0%), family history of pancreatic cancer (15% vs 8%), and chemotherapy treatment (79% vs 66%). The late-age group had higher proportions of Black patients (13% vs 6%), metabolic syndrome (68% vs 30%), prior cancer diagnosis (30% vs 6%), and body-of-pancreas tumors (78% vs 42%). Although median survival was higher in the late-age group (25 vs 20 months), Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better overall survival probabilities in early-age patients (P = 0.431). The hazard function and ratio (0.832, P = 0.506) demonstrated that late-age patients had higher instantaneous risk of death. Conclusion: Clinical and demographic differences suggest a potential genetic or ethnic predisposition to PDAC in younger patients, who were also more likely to receive chemotherapy. In contrast, later diagnosis may reflect cumulative exposures or delayed detection. Although older patients showed slightly longer median survival, overall survival favored the younger cohort. The study is limited by small sample size; ongoing retrospective review of over 2,000 additional patients is planned to enhance statistical power in future analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001126572.61770.15
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S28 Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Mina Zheng, Michael K.K. Wong, Kazi Masel Ullah, Lionel D’Souza et al.
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

S28 Characteristics of Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Mina Zheng, Michael K.K. Wong, Kazi Masel Ullah, Lionel D’Souza, Alexandra Rusz
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Studies from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry have indicated a rise in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cases among individuals under 60 years of age in recent years. Early-onset PDAC has been linked to family history of pancreatic cancer, metabolic syndrome, smoking, pancreatitis, and germline mutations. However, risk factors contributing to early presentation remain poorly defined. We aim to analyze clinicopathological/demographic differences in early diagnosis of PDAC (defined as age ≤60 years) vs a late diagnosis (defined as age >60 years). Methods: Clinicopathological/demographic data was retrospectively collected from patients diagnosed with pancreatic neoplasms at our tertiary-care center from 2014 to 2023. MRNs were extracted via TriNetX and de-identified under IRB approval. Patients without PDAC or staging were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v29.0. Univariate analyses compared baseline characteristics. Survival was assessed via Kaplan-Meier and compared via log-rank test. Hazard function illustrated time-dependent risk. Variables associated with survival (P < 0.25) in univariate cox regression were included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model to estimate adjusted hazard ratios. Results: Of the 133 patients (33 early-age and 100 late-age), the early-age group had higher proportions of male gender (67% vs 51%), Hispanic ethnicity (12% vs 0%), family history of pancreatic cancer (15% vs 8%), and chemotherapy treatment (79% vs 66%). The late-age group had higher proportions of Black patients (13% vs 6%), metabolic syndrome (68% vs 30%), prior cancer diagnosis (30% vs 6%), and body-of-pancreas tumors (78% vs 42%). Although median survival was higher in the late-age group (25 vs 20 months), Kaplan-Meier analysis showed better overall survival probabilities in early-age patients (P = 0.431). The hazard function and ratio (0.832, P = 0.506) demonstrated that late-age patients had higher instantaneous risk of death. Conclusion: Clinical and demographic differences suggest a potential genetic or ethnic predisposition to PDAC in younger patients, who were also more likely to receive chemotherapy. In contrast, later diagnosis may reflect cumulative exposures or delayed detection. Although older patients showed slightly longer median survival, overall survival favored the younger cohort. The study is limited by small sample size; ongoing retrospective review of over 2,000 additional patients is planned to enhance statistical power in future analyses.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.